ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Quantify query ambiguity using ODP metadata
Full text PdfPdf (151 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages: 697 - 698  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-597-7
Authors
Guang Qiu  Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Kangmiao Liu  Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Jiajun Bu  Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Chun Chen  Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Zhiming Kang  Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1277741.1277864
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Query ambiguity prevents existing retrieval systems from returning reasonable results for every query. As there is already lots of work done on resolving ambiguity, vague queries could be handled using corresponding approaches separately if they can be identified in advance. Quantification of the degree of (lack of) ambiguity laysthe groundwork for the identification. In this poster, we propose such a measure using query topics based on the topic structure selected from the Open Directory Project (ODP) taxonomy. We introduce clarity score to quantify the lack of ambiguity with respect to data sets constructed from the TREC collections and the rank correlation test results demonstrate a strong positive association between the clarity scores and retrieval precisions for queries.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
H. Schutze and J. Pederson. Information retrieval based on word senses. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, pages 161--175, 1995.
 
4
I. Soboroff. Overview of the trec 2004 novelty track. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2004), NIST Special Publication 500--261, 2004.
 
5
E. Voorhees. Overview of the trec 2003 robust retrieval track. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings (TREC 2003), NIST Special Publication 500--255, 2003.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Guang Qiu: colleagues
Kangmiao Liu: colleagues
Jiajun Bu: colleagues
Chun Chen: colleagues
Zhiming Kang: colleagues