ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Term feedback for information retrieval with language models
Full text PdfPdf (258 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
SESSION: Interaction table of contents
Pages: 263 - 270  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-597-7
Authors
Bin Tan  University of Illinois
Atulya Velivelli  University of Illinois
Hui Fang  University of Illinois
ChengXiang Zhai  University of Illinois
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1277741.1277788
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we study term-based feedback for information retrieval in the language modeling approach. With term feedback a user directly judges the relevance of individual terms without interaction with feedback documents, taking full control of the query expansion process. We propose a cluster-based method for selecting terms to present to the user for judgment, as well as effective algorithms for constructing refined query language models from user term feedback. Our algorithms are shown to bring significant improvement in retrieval accuracy over a non-feedback baseline, and achieve comparable performance to relevance feedback. They are helpful even when there are no relevant documents in the top.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
J. Allan. HARD track overview in TREC 2005 -- High Accuracy Retrieval from Documents. In The Fourteenth Text REtrieval Conference, 2005.
3
4
 
5
C. Buckley, G. Salton, J. Allan, and A. Singhal. Automatic query expansion using SMART. In Proceedings of the Third Text REtrieval Conference, 1994.
6
 
7
N. A. Jaleel, A. Corrada-Emmanuel, Q. Li, X. Liu, C. Wade, and J. Allan. UMass at TREC 2003: HARD and QA. In TREC, pages 715--725, 2003.
8
 
9
K. S. Jones, S. Walker, and S. E. Robertson. A probabilistic model of information retrieval: development and status. Technical Report 446, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 1998.
10
11
12
13
14
 
15
 
16
S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. Beaulieu, and M. Gatford. Okapi at TREC-3. In Proceedings of the Third Text REtrieval Conference, 1994.
 
17
J. Rocchio. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In The SMART retrieval system, pages 313--323. 1971.
18
 
19
G. Salton and C. Buckley. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41:288--297, 1990.
20
21
 
22
23
 
24
H. Zaragoza, N. Craswell, M. Taylor, S. Saria, and S. Robertson. Microsoft cambridge at TREC-13: Web and HARD tracks. In Proceedings of the 13th Text REtrieval Conference, 2004.
25
26


Collaborative Colleagues:
Bin Tan: colleagues
Atulya Velivelli: colleagues
Hui Fang: colleagues
ChengXiang Zhai: colleagues