ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the complexity of real solving bivariate systems
Full text PdfPdf (323 KB)
Source
International Conference on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation archive
Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation table of contents
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
SESSION: Contributed papers table of contents
Pages: 127 - 134  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-743-8
Authors
Dimitrios I. Diochnos  National University of Athens
Ioannis Z. Emiris  National University of Athens
Elias P. Tsigaridas  LORIA-INRIA Lorraine
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAM: ACM Special Interest Group on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 26,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1277548.1277567
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider exact real solving of well-constrained, bivariate systems of relatively prime polynomials. The main problem is to compute all common real roots in isolating interval representation, and to determine their intersection multiplicities. We present three algorithms and analyze their asymptotic bit complexity, obtaining a bound of ÕB(N14) for the purely projection-based method, and ÕB(N12) for two subresultants-based methods: these ignore polylogarithmic factors, and N bounds the degree and the bitsize of the polynomials. The previous record bound was ÕB(N14).

Our main tool is signed subresultant sequences, extended to several variables by binary segmentation. We exploit advances on the complexity of univariate root isolation, and extend them to multipoint sign evaluation, sign evaluation of bivariate polynomials over two algebraic numbers, and real root counting over an extension field. Our algorithms apply to the problem of simultaneous inequalities; they also compute the topology of real plane algebraic curves in.

All algorithms have been implemented in maple, in conjunction with numeric filtering. We compare them against fgb/rs and synaps; we also consider maple libraries insulate and top, which compute curve topology. Our software is among the most robust, and its runtimes are within a small constant factor, with respect to the C/C++ libraries.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Abbott. Quadratic interval refinement for real roots. In ISSAC 2006, poster. www.dima.unige.it/~abbott/.
 
2
 
3
4
 
5
 
6
D. I. Diochnos, I. Z. Emiris, and E. P. Tsigaridas. On the complexity of real solving bivariate systems. Research Report 6116, INRIA, 2007. https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00129309.
 
7
Z. Du, V. Sharma, and C. K. Yap. Amortized bound for root isolation via Sturm sequences. Int. Workshop on Symbolic Numeric Computing, pp. 81--93, Beijing, 2005.
8
9
 
10
I. Z. Emiris, B. Mourrain, and E. P. Tsigaridas. Real Algebraic Numbers: Complexity Analysis and Experimentation. Reliable Implementations of Real Number Algorithms: Theory and Practice, LNCS (to appear). Springer Verlag, 2007. also available in www.inria.fr/rrrt/rr-5897.html.
 
11
I. Z. Emiris and E. P. Tsigaridas. Real solving of bivariate polynomial systems. In Proc. Comp. Algebra in Scient. Comput., vol. 3718 LNCS, pp. 150--161. Springer, 2005.
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
K. Ko, T. Sakkalis, and N. Patrikalakis. Resolution of multiple roots of nonlinear polynomial systems. Int. J. Shape Modelling, 11(1):121--147, 2005.
 
17
 
18
 
19
M. Mignotte and D. Stefanescu. Polynomials: An algorithmic approach. Springer, 1999.
 
20
P. Milne. On the solution of a set of polynomial equations. In B. Donald, D. Kapur, and J. Mundy, editors, Symbolic and Numerical Computation for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 89--102. Academic Press, 1992.
 
21
B. Mourrain and J.-P. Pavone. Subdivision methods for solving polynomial equations. TR-5658, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, 2005.
 
22
B. Mourrain, S. Pion, S. Schmitt, J.-P. Técourt, E. Tsigaridas, and N. Wolpert. Algebraic issues in computational geometry. Effective Computational Geometry for Curves and Surfaces, pp. 117--155. Springer-Verlag, 2006.
23
 
24
 
25
P. Pedersen, M-F. Roy, and A. Szpirglas. Counting real zeros in the multivariate case. In Computational Algebraic Geometry, vol. 109 of Progress in Mathematics, pp. 203--224. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1993.
26
 
27
 
28
F. Rouillier. Solving zero-dimensional systems through the rational univariate representation. J. AAECC, 9:433--461, 1999.
 
29
 
30
31
 
32
 
33
N. Wolpert. An Exact and Efficient Approach for Computing a Cell in an Arrangement of Quadrics. PhD thesis, MPI Informatik, 2002.
34
 
35


Collaborative Colleagues:
Dimitrios I. Diochnos: colleagues
Ioannis Z. Emiris: colleagues
Elias P. Tsigaridas: colleagues