ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Comparing two models to generate hyper-heuristics for the 2d-regular bin-packing problem
Full text PdfPdf (208 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
London, England
SESSION: Real-world applications: papers table of contents
Pages: 2182 - 2189  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-697-4
Authors
H. Terashima-Marin  ITESM-Intelligent Systems, Monterrey, NL, Mexico
C. J. Farias Zarate  ITESM-Intelligent Systems, Monterrey, NL, Mexico
P. Ross  Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
M. Valenzuela-Rendon  ITESM-Intelligent Systems, Monterrey, NL, Mexico
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 53,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1276958.1277377
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The idea behind hyper-heuristics is to discover some combination of straightforward heuristics to solve a wide range of problems. To be worthwhile, such combination should outperform the single heuristics. This paper presents two Evolutionary-Computation-based Models to producehyper-heuristics that solve two-dimensional bin-packing problems. The first model uses an XCS-type Learning Classifier System which learns a solution procedure when solving individual problems. The second model is based on a GA that uses a variable-length representation, which evolves combinations of condition-action rules producing hyper-heuristics after going through alearning process which includes training and testing phases.Both approaches, when tested and compared using a large set ofbenchmark problems, perform better than the combinations ofsingle heuristics. The testbed is composed of problems used inother similar studies in the literature. Some additional instances of the testbed were randomly generated.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
H. Terashima-Marín Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, N. L., Mexico
 
2
C. J. Farias-Zárate Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, N. L. , Mexico
 
3
P. Ross Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
 
4
M. Valenzuela-Rendón Tecnolégico de Monterrey, Monterrey, N. L., Mexico
 
5
 
6
J. E. Beasley. Beasley operations research library. Collection of problems for 2D packing and cutting, 2003.
 
7
J. O. Berkey and PY. Wang. Two-dimensional finite bin packing algorithms. Journal of Operational Research Society, 38:423--429, 1987.
 
8
E. Burke, E. Hart, G. Kendall, J. Newall, P. Ross, and S. Schulenburg. Hyper-heuristics: An emerging direction in modern research technolology. In Handbook of Metaheuristics, pages 457--474. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
 
9
C. H. Cheng, B. R. Fiering, and T. C. Chang. The cutting stock problem. a survey. International Journal of Production Economics, 36:291--305, 1994.
 
10
H. Dyckhoff. A topology of cutting and packing problems. European Journal of Operation Research, 44:145--159, 1990.
 
11
D. B. Fogel, L. A. Owens, and M. Walsh. Artificial Intelligence through Simulated Evolution. Wiley, New York, 1966.
 
12
 
13
 
14
D. Goldberg, B. Korb, and K. Deb. Messy genetic algorithms: Motivation, analysis and first results. Complex Systems, pages pp. 93--130, 1989.
 
15
B. L. Golden. Approaches to the cutting stock problem. AIIE Transactions, 8:256--274, 1976.
 
16
 
17
E. Hopper and B. C. Turton. An empirical study of meta-heuristics applied to 2D rectangular bin packing. Studia Informatica Universalis, pages 77--106, 2001.
 
18
S. Jakobs. On genetic algorithms for the packing of polygons. European Journal of Operations Research, 88:165--181, 1966.
 
19
L. V. Kantorovich. Mathematical methods of organizing and planning production. Management Science, 6:366--422, 1960.
 
20
D. Liu and H. Teng. An improved BL-algorithm for genetic algorithm of the orthogonal packing of rectangle. European Journal of Operations Research, 112:413--419, 1999.
 
21
S. Martello and D. Vigo. Exact solution of the two-dimensional finite bin packing problem. Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informatica e Sistematica, 1998.
 
22
I. Rechenberg. Evolutionstrategie: Optimierung technischer systeme nach prinzipien dier biolischen evolution. Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart, 1973.
 
23
 
24
25
26
 
27
R. A. Wilson and F. C. Keil. The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Science. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussets, 1999.
 
28
S. W. Wilson. Generalization in the XCS classifier system. Evolutionary Computation}, 1998.
 
29
G. Wäscher, H. Haussner, and H. Schumann. An improved typology of cutting and packing problems. European Journal of Operation Research, 171, 2006.

Collaborative Colleagues:
H. Terashima-Marin: colleagues
C. J. Farias Zarate: colleagues
P. Ross: colleagues
M. Valenzuela-Rendon: colleagues