|
ABSTRACT
In this paper we introduce XCSF with support vector prediction:the problem of learning the prediction function is solved as a support vector regression problem and each classifier exploits a Support Vector Machine to compute the prediction. In XCSF with support vector prediction, XCSFsvm, the genetic algorithm adapts classifier conditions, classifier actions, and the SVM kernel parameters.We compare XCSF with support vector prediction to XCSF with linear prediction on the approximation of four test functions.Our results suggest that XCSF with support vector prediction compared to XCSF with linear prediction (i) is able to evolve accurate approximations of more difficult functions, (ii) has better generalization capabilities and (iii) learns faster.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Martin V. Butz, Pier-Luca Lanzi, and Stewart W. Wilson. Function approximation with XCS: Hyperellipsoidal conditions, recursive least squares, and compaction. (Available on request from www.illigal.org/butz), 2007.
|
| |
3
|
Martin V. Butz and Stewart W. Wilson. An algorithmic description of XCS. Journal of Soft Computing, 6(3---4):144---153, 2002.
|
| |
4
|
Gert Cauwenberghs and Tomaso Poggio. Incremental and decremental support vector machine learning. In NIPS, pages 409--415, 2000.
|
| |
5
|
Chih-Chung Chang and Chih-Jen Lin. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/$\backsim$cjlin/libsvm, 2001.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
S. A. Glantz and B. K. Slinker. Primer of Applied Regression & Analysis of Variance. McGraw Hill, 2001. second edition.
|
| |
9
|
Pier Luca Lanzi, Daniele Loiacono, Stewart W. Wilson, and Dave E. Goldberg. Generalization in the XCSF classifier system: Analysis, improvement, and extension. Technical Report 2005012, Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory -- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2005.
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Pier Luca Lanzi, Daniele Loiacono, Stewart~W. Wilson, and David E. Goldberg. XCS with computed prediction for the learning of boolean functions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation -- CEC--2005, pages 588--595, Edinburgh, UK, September 2005. IEEE.
|
 |
12
|
Pier Luca Lanzi , Daniele Loiacono , Stewart W. Wilson , David E. Goldberg, Prediction update algorithms for XCSF: RLS, Kalman filter, and gain adaptation, Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, July 08-12, 2006, Seattle, Washington, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1143997.1144243]
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Mario Martin. On-line support vector machines for function approximation. Technical report, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 2002.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
R. Rosipal and M. Gorilami. An adaptive support vector regression filter: A signal detection application. In Artificial Neural Networks, 1999. ICANN 99. Ninth International Conference on (Conf. Publ. No. 470), volume 2, pages 603--607 vol.2, 7-10 Sept. 1999.
|
| |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
Nadeem Ahmed Syed , Huan Liu , Kah Kay Sung, Handling concept drifts in incremental learning with support vector machines, Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, p.317-321, August 15-18, 1999, San Diego, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/312129.312267]
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
S. Vijayakumar and S. Wu. Sequential support vector classifiers and regression. In Int. Conf. Soft Computing}, pages 610--619, 1999.
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
Stewart W. Wilson. Classifier Fitness Based on Accuracy. Evolutionary Computation, 3(2):149--175, 1995. http://prediction-dynamics.com/.
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
|