ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Quality time tradeoff operator for designing efficient multi level genetic algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (174 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
London, England
POSTER SESSION: Genetic algorithms: posters table of contents
Pages: 1527 - 1527  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-697-4
Authors
George Mitchell  DCU, Dublin, Ireland
Barry McMullin  DCU, Dublin, Ireland
James Decraene  DCU, Dublin, Ireland
Ciaran Kelly  DCU, Dublin, Ireland
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1276958.1277256
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a novel cost benefit operator that assists multi levelgenetic algorithm searches. Through the use of the cost benefitoperator, it is possible to dynamically constrain the search of thebase level genetic algorithms, to suit the users requirements. We note that the current literature has abundant studies on metaevolutionary GAs, however these approaches have not identifiedan efficient approach to the termination of base GA searchs or ameans to balance practical consideration such as quality ofsolution and the expense of computation. Our Quality timetradeoff operator (QTT) is user defined, and acts as a base leveltermination operator and also provides a fitness value for themeta-level GA. In this manner, the amount of computation timespent on less encouraging configurations can be specified by theuser. Our approach was applied to a computationally intensive test problem which evaluates a large set of configuration settings forthe base GAs to find suitable configuration settings (populationsize, crossover operator and rate, mutation operator and rate,repair or penalty and the use of adaptive mutation rates) forselected TSP problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Sosic and G. D. Wilby, "Using the Quality-Time Tradeoff in Local optimization.," Proceedings of the IEEE Second ANZIIS Conference, pp. 253--257, 1994.
 
2
G. G. Mitchell, "Validity Constraints and the TSP-GeneRepair of Genetic Algorithms.," Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pp. 306--311, 2005

Collaborative Colleagues:
George Mitchell: colleagues
Barry McMullin: colleagues
James Decraene: colleagues
Ciaran Kelly: colleagues