ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
ExGA II: an improved exonic genetic algorithm for the multiple knapsack problem
Full text PdfPdf (209 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
London, England
SESSION: Genetic algorithms: papers table of contents
Pages: 1357 - 1364  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-697-4
Authors
Philipp Rohlfshagen  University of Birmingham
John A. Bullinaria  University of Birmingham
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1276958.1277212
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

ExGA I, a previously presented genetic algorithm, successfully solved numerous instances of the multiple knapsack problem (MKS) by employing an adaptive repair function that made use of the algorithm's modular encoding. Here we present ExGA II, an extension of ExGA I that implements additional features which allow the algorithm to perform more reliably across a larger set of benchmark problems. In addition to some basic modifications of the algorithm's framework, more specific extensions include the use of a biased mutation operator and adaptive control sequences which are used to guide the repair procedure. The success rate of ExGA II is superior to its predecessor, and other algorithms in the literature, without an overall increase in the number of function evaluations required to reach the global optimum. In fact, the new algorithm exhibits a significant reduction in the number of function evaluations required for the largest problems investigated. We also address the computational cost of using a repair function and show that the algorithm remains highly competitive when this cost is accounted for.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
C. Cotta and J. M. Troya. A hybrid genetic algorithm for the 0-1 multiple knapsack problem. In G. D. Smith, N. C. Steele, and R. F. Albrecht, editors, Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms pages 250--254. Springer, 1997.
 
3
S. J. Freeland and L. D. Hurst. The genetic code is one in a million. J. Mol. Evol. 47:238--248, 1998.
 
4
A. Herbet and A. Rich. RNA processing and the evolution of eukaryotes. Nature Genetics 21:265--269, 1999.
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
P. Rohlfshagen and J. A. Bullinaria. An exonic genetic algorithm with RNA editing inspired repair function for the multiple knapsack problem. In Proceedings of the UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (UKCI 2006)pages 17--24, Leeds, UK, 2006.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Philipp Rohlfshagen: colleagues
John A. Bullinaria: colleagues