Terminological and ontological analysis of European directives: multilinguism in law

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the philosophy behind our tool called "Legal Taxonomy Syllabus", the analytical instruments it provides and some case studies. The Legal Taxonomy Syllabus is an ontology based tool designed to annotate and recover multi-lingua legal information and build conceptual dictionaries. The Legal Taxonomy Syllabus allows to build legal dictionaries in a bottom up fashion starting from the annotation of legal terms by legal terminological experts and to let legal ontology engineers refine the resulting taxonomies of concepts. The Legal Taxonomy Syllabus and its analytical tools provide help to lawyers to study the peculiarities of European Union Directives concerning the polysemy of legal terms, and the terminological and conceptual misalignment. By means of two case studies we show how the Legal Taxonomy Syllabus can help the processes of drafting and translating of the Directives.

REFERENCES

• 1: Alexander Boer , Tom van Engers , Radboud Winkels, Using ontologies for comparing and harmonizing legislation, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 24-28, 2003, Scotland, United Kingdom [doi>10.1145/1047788.1047798]
• 2: P. Casanovas, N. Casellas, C. Tempich, D. Vrandecic, and R. Benjamins. Opjk modeling methodology. In Proceedings of the ICAIL Workshop: LOAIT 2005, 2005.
• 3: G. R. De Groot. Das übersetzen juristischer Terminologie. In De Groot and R. Schulze, editors, Recht und Übersetzen, page 11 ff, Baden-Baden, 1999. Nomos.
• 4: S. Després and S. Szulman. Merging of legal micro-ontologies from european directives. Artificial Intelligence and Law, ??:??-??, 2006. In press.
• 5: J. Euzenat. Semantic precision and recall for ontology alignment evaluation. In Proc. 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 348--353, 2007.
• 6: Aldo Gangemi , Nicola Guarino , Claudio Masolo , Alessandro Oltramari , Luc Schneider, Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web, p.166-181, October 01-04, 2002
• 7: Giguet Emmanuel , LUQUET Pierre-Sylvain, Multilingual lexical database generation from parallel texts in 20 European languages with endogenous resources, Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Main conference poster sessions, p.271-278, July 17-18, 2006, Sydney, Australia
• 8: M. Graziadei. Tuttifrutti. In P. Birks and A. Pretto, editors, Themes in Comparative Law, pages-. Oxford University Press, 2004.
• 9: M. Klein. Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions. In Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, IJCAI'01, Seattle, USA, 2001.
• 10: L. Lesmo, M. Graziadei, G. Boella, A. Mazzei, and P. Rossi. The next EurLex: what should be done for the needs of lawyers belonging to different national legal systems? In Procs. of Jurix EU-Workshop, 2005.
• 11: Daniel Oberle, Semantic Management of Middleware (Semantic Web and Beyond: Computing for Human Experience), Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, 2006
• 12: B. Pozzo. Harmonisation of european contract law and the need of creating a common terminology. European Review of Private Law, 6:754--767, 2003.
• 13: P. Rossi and C. Vogel. Terms and concepts; towards a syllabus for european private law. European Review of Private Law (ERPL), 12(2):293--300, 2004.
• 14: R. Sacco. La traduction juridique: un point de vue italien. Les Cahiers du Droit, 28(4):845 ff, 1987.
• 15: R. Sacco. Contract. European Review of Private Law, 2:237--240, 1999.
• 16: R. Steinberger, B. Pouliquen, A. Widiger, C. Ignat, T. Erjavec, D. Tufis, and D. Varga. The JRC-Acquis: A multilingual aligned parallel corpus with 20+ languages. In Proc. of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC06, pages 1--6, 2006.
• 17: J. Vanderlinden. Comparer les droits. Story-Scientia, Bruxelles, 1995.
• 18: P. R. S. Visser and T. J. M. Bench-Capon. A comparison of four ontologies for the design of legal knowledge systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 6:27--57, 1998.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS