Towards qualitative approaches to Bayesian evidential reasoning

ABSTRACT

A crucial aspect of evidential reasoning in crime investigation involves comparing the support that evidence provides for alternative hypotheses. Recent work in forensic statistics has shown how Bayesian Networks (BNs) can be employed for this purpose. However, the specification of BNs requires conditional probability tables describing the uncertain processes under evaluation. When these processes are poorly understood, it is necessary to rely on subjective probabilities provided by experts. Accurate probabilities of this type are normally hard to acquire from experts. Recent work in qualitative reasoning has developed methods to perform probabilistic reasoning using coarser representations. However, the latter types of approaches are too imprecise to compare the likelihood of alternative hypotheses. This paper examines this shortcoming of the qualitative approaches when applied to the aforementioned problem, and identifies and integrates techniques to refine them.

REFERENCES

• 1: C. Aitken, F. Taroni, and P. Garbolino. A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in dna profiles. Theoretical Population Biology, 63:179--190, 2003.
• 2: Floris Bex , Henry Prakken , Chris Reed , Douglas Walton, Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations, Artificial Intelligence and Law, v.11 n.2-3, p.125-165, January 2003 [doi>10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a]
• 3: A. Biedermann and F. Taroni. Bayesian networks and probabilistic reasoning about scientific evidence when there is a lack of data. Forensic Science International, 157(2--3):163--167, 2006.
• 4: R. Cook, I. Evett, G. Jackson, P. Jones, and J. Lambert. A model for case assessment and interpretation. Science and Justice, 38(3):151--156, 1998.
• 5: P. Dague. Symbolic reasoning with relative orders of magnitude. In Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1509--1514, 1993.
• 6: M. Druzdzel and M. Henrion. Efficient reasoning in qualitative probabilistic networks. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 548--553, 1993.
• 7: Marek J. Druzdzel , Linda C. van der Gaag, Building Probabilistic Networks: 'Where Do the Numbers Come From?' Guest Editors' Introduction, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, v.12 n.4, p.481-486, July 2000 [doi>10.1109/TKDE.2000.868901]
• 8: Joe Halliwell , Jeroen Keppens , Qiang Shen, Linguistic Bayesian Networks for reasoning with subjective probabilities in forensic statistics, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, June 24-28, 2003, Scotland, United Kingdom [doi>10.1145/1047788.1047795]
• 9: J. Halliwell and Q. Shen. Towards a linguistic probability theory. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Fuzzy Sets and Systems, pages 596--601, 2002.
• 10: D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. Judgement Under Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
• 11: Carmen Lacave , Francisco J. Díez, A review of explanation methods for Bayesian networks, The Knowledge Engineering Review, v.17 n.2, p.107-127, June 2002 [doi>10.1017/S026988890200019X]
• 12: J. Mortera, A. Dawid, and S. Lauritzen. Probabilistic expert systems for dna mixture profiling. Theoretical Population Biology, 63:191--205, 2003.
• 13: P. Nayak. Order of magnitude reasoning using logarithms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 201--210, 1992.
• 14: S. Parsons. Refining reasoning in qualitative probabilistic networks. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1995.
• 15: Simon Parsons, Qualitative probability and order of magnitude reasoning, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, v.11 n.3, p.373-390, June 2003 [doi>10.1142/S0218488503002132]
• 16: S. Parsons. On precise and correct qualitative probabilistic inference. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 35(2):111--135, 2004.
• 17: S. Parsons and E. Mamdani. On reasoning in networks with qualitative uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1993.
• 18: Judea Pearl, Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1988
• 19: Olivier Raiman, Order of magnitude reasoning, Artificial Intelligence, v.51 n.1-3, p.11-38, Oct. 1991 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(91)90107-U]
• 20: Silja Renooij , Linda C. van der Gaag , Simon Parsons, Context-specific sign-propagation in qualitative probabilistic networks, Artificial Intelligence, v.140 n.1-2, p.207-230, September 2002 [doi>10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00247-3]
• 21: D. Schum. Evidential foundations of probabilistic reasoning. John Wiley and Sons, 1994.
• 22: M. P. Wellman, Fundamental concepts of qualitative probabilistic networks, Artificial Intelligence, v.44 n.3, p.257-303, Aug. 1990 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(90)90026-V]
• 23: M. P. Wellman , M. Henrion, Explaining 'Explaining Away', IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, v.15 n.3, p.287-292, March 1993 [doi>10.1109/34.204911]
• 24: A. Zimmer. Verbal vs. numerical processing of subjective probabilities. In R. Scholz, editor, Decision making under uncertainty. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.
• 25: A. Zimmer. What uncertainty judgements can tell about the underlying subjective probabilities. In L. Kanal and J. Lemmer, editors, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
evidential reasoning, qualitative probabilistic networks