ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Hierarchical Gaussian process latent variable models
Full text PdfPdf (411 KB)
Source ICML; Vol. 227 archive
Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Corvalis, Oregon
Pages: 481 - 488  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-793-3
Authors
Neil D. Lawrence  University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
Andrew J. Moore  University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K.
Sponsor
: Machine Learning Journal
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 107,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1273496.1273557
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Gaussian process latent variable model (GP-LVM) is a powerful approach for probabilistic modelling of high dimensional data through dimensional reduction. In this paper we extend the GP-LVM through hierarchies. A hierarchical model (such as a tree) allows us to express conditional independencies in the data as well as the manifold structure. We first introduce Gaussian process hierarchies through a simple dynamical model, we then extend the approach to a more complex hierarchy which is applied to the visualisation of human motion data sets.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Awasthi, P., Gagrani, A., & Ravindran, B. (2007). Image modelling using tree structured conditional random fields. Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007) (pp. 2060--2065).
 
2
 
3
 
4
Felzenszwalb, P. F., & Huttenlocher, D. P. (2000). Efficient matching of pictorial structures. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 66--73). Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, U.S.A.: IEEE Computer Society Press.
 
5
 
6
Ferris, B. D., Fox, D., & Lawrence, N. D. (2007). WiFi-SLAM using Gaussian process latent variable models. Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007) (pp. 2480--2485).
7
 
8
Ioffe, S., & Forsyth, D. A. (2001). Mixtures of trees for object recognition. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 180--185). Hawaii, U.S.A.: IEEE Computer Society Press.
 
9
 
10
Lawrence, N. D. (2004). Gaussian process models for visualisation of high dimensional data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 329--336). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
11
12
 
13
MacKay, D. J. C. (1995). Bayesian neural networks and density networks. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, A, 354, 73--80.
 
14
MacKay, D. J. C. (1998). Introduction to Gaussian Processes. In C. M. Bishop (Ed.), Neural networks and machine learning, vol. 168 of Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, 133--166. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
 
15
 
16
Ramanan, D., & Forsyth, D. A. (2003). Finding and tracking people from the bottom up. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 467--474). Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.: IEEE Computer Society Press.
 
17
 
18
Sigal, L., Bhatia, S., Roth, S., Black, M. J., & Isard, M. (2004). Tracking loose-limbed people. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 421--428). Washington, DC, U.S.A.: IEEE Computer Society Press.
 
19
 
20
Tipping, M. E., & Bishop, C. M. (1999). Probabilistic principal component analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 6, 611--622.
 
21
 
22
 
23
Wang, J. M., Fleet, D. J., & Hertzmann, A. (2006). Gaussian process dynamical models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
24
Williams, C. K. I., & Feng, X. (1999). Tree-structured belief networks as models of images. Proceedings Ninth International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, ICANN'99.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Neil D. Lawrence: colleagues
Andrew J. Moore: colleagues