ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Overview of the TREC 2006 ciQA task
Full text PdfPdf (351 KB)
Source
ACM SIGIR Forum archive
Volume 41 ,  Issue 1  (June 2007) table of contents
Pages: 107 - 116  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:0163-5840
Authors
Diane Kelly  University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Jimmy Lin  University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1273221.1273231
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Growing interest in interactive systems for answering complex questions lead to the development of the complex, interactive QA (ciQA) task, introduced for the first time at TREC 2006. This paper describes the rationale and design of the ciQA task and the evaluation results. Thirty complex relationship questions based on five question templates were investigated using the AQUAINT collection of newswire text. Interaction forms were the primary vehicle for defining and capturing user-system interactions. In total, six groups participated in the ciQA task and contributed ten different sets of interaction forms. There were two main findings: baseline IR techniques are competitive for complex QA and interaction, at least as defined and implemented in this evaluation, did not appear to improve performance by much.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Allan. 2005. HARD track overview in TREC 2005: High accuracy retrieval from documents. In TREC 2005.
 
2
H. Dang, J. Lin, and D. Kelly. 2006. Overview of the TREC 2006 question answering track. In TREC 2006.
 
3
S. Dumais and N. Belkin. 2005. The TREC interactive tracks: Putting the user into search. In Voorhees and Harman, editors, TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
 
4
W. Hersh and P. Over. 2001. Interactivity at the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC). IP&M, 37(3):365--367.
 
5
W. Hersh, A. Cohen, J. Yang, R. Bhupatiraju, P. Roberts, and M. Hearst. 2005. TREC 2005 Genomics Track overview. In TREC 2005.
 
6
 
7
A. Spink. 1997. Study of interactive feedback during mediated information retrieval. JASIS, 48(5):382--394.
 
8
E. Voorhees and H. Dang. 2005. Overview of the TREC 2005 question answering track. In TREC 2005.
 
9
E. Voorhees. 2003. Overview of the TREC 2003 question answering track. In TREC 2003.