ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating XML retrieval effectiveness at INEX
Full text PdfPdf (439 KB)
Source
ACM SIGIR Forum archive
Volume 41 ,  Issue 1  (June 2007) table of contents
Pages: 40 - 57  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:0163-5840
Authors
Mounia Lalmas  University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK
Anastasios Tombros  University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1273221.1273225
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The INitiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX) was set up in 2002 to establish an infrastructure and provide means, in the form of large test collections and appropriate scoring methods, for evaluating the effectiveness of content-oriented XML retrieval systems. This report provides an overview of the evaluation methodology developed in INEX from 2002 to 2006.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. L. Clarke. Range results in XML retrieval. In INEX 2005 Workshop on Element Retrieval Methodology, pages 4--5, 2005.
2
 
3
N. Fuhr, N. Gövert, G. Kazai, and M. Lalmas, editors. INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX). Proceedings of the First INEX Workshop (INEX 2002), ERCIM Workshop Proceedings, 2003.
 
4
N. Fuhr, M. Lalmas, and S. Malik, editors. INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX). Proceedings of the Second INEX Workshop (INEX 2003), 2004.
 
5
 
6
 
7
N. Fuhr, M. Lalmas, and A. Trotman, editors. Comparative Evaluation of XML Information Retrieval Systems, 5th International Workshop of the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX 2006), Springer, 2007.
 
8
 
9
D. Hawking, E. M. Voorhees, N. Craswell, and P. Bailey. Overview of the TREC-8 Web Track. In TREC, 1999.
10
11
 
12
G. Kazai. Choosing an Ideal Recall-Base for the Evaluation of the Focused Task: Sensitivity Analysis of the XCG Evaluation Measures. In Fuhr et al. {7}.
 
13
G. Kazai and M. Lalmas. Notes on What to Measure in INEX. In INEX 2005 Workshop on Element Retrieval Methodology, Glasgow, July 2005.
14
 
15
G. Kazai and M. Lalmas. INEX 2005 Evaluation Metrics. In Fuhr et al. {5}.
16
 
17
G. Kazai, S. Masood, and M. Lalmas. A study of the assessment of relevance for the INEX'02 test collection. In ECIR, pages 296--310, 2004.
 
18
 
19
M. Lalmas, G. Kazai, J. Kamps, J. Pehcevski, B. Piwowarski, and S. Robertson. INEX 2006 Evaluation Measures. In Fuhr et al. {7}.
 
20
M. Lalmas and A. Tombros. INEX 2002 - 2006: Understanding XML Retrieval Evaluation. In DELOS Conference on Digital Libraries, Tirrenia, Pisa, Italy, 2007.
21
 
22
J. Pehcevski and J. A. Thom. Hixeval: Highlighting xml retrieval evaluation. In Advances in XML Information Retrieval and Evaluation: Fourth Workshop of the INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX 2005), 2006.
23
24
25
26
 
27
A. Trotman and S. Geva. Passage Retrieval and Other XML-Retrieval Tasks. In SIGIR 2006 Workshop on XML Element Retrieval Methodology, pages 43--50, 2006.
28
29
 
30
A. Trotman and B. Sigurbjornsson. Narrowed extended XPATHI (NEXI). In INEX 2004 Workshop Proceedings, pages 16--40, 2004.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Mounia Lalmas: colleagues
Anastasios Tombros: colleagues