Distortion in 3D shape estimation with changes in illumination

ABSTRACT

In many domains it is very important that observers form an accurate percept of 3-dimensional structure from 2-dimensional images of scenes or objects. This is particularly relevant for designers who need to make decisions concerning the refinement of novel objects that haven't been physically built yet. This study presents the results of two experiments whose goal was to test the effect of lighting direction on the shape perception of smooth surfaces using shading and lighting techniques commonly used in modeling and design software.

The first experiment consisted of a 2 alternate forced choice task which compared the effect of the amount of shape difference between smooth surfaces lit by a single point light with whether the position of the light sources were the same or different for each surface. Results show that, as the difference between the shapes decreased, participants were more and more biased towards choosing the match shape lit by the same source as the test shape.

In the second experiment, participants had to report the orientation at equivalent probe locations on pairs of smooth surfaces presented simultaneously, using gauge figures. The surfaces could either be the same or slightly different and the light source of each shape could either be at the same relative location or offset by 90° horizontally. Participants reported large differences in surface orientation when the lighting condition was different, even when the shapes were the same, confirming the first results.

Our findings show that lighting conditions can have a strong effect on 3-dimensional perception, and suggest that great care should be taken when projection systems are used for 3D visualisation where an accurate representation is required, either by carefully choosing lighting conditions or by using more realistic rendering techniques.

REFERENCES

• 1: Belhumeur, P., Kriegman, D., and Yuille, A., 1997. The bas-relief ambiguity.
• 2: James A. Ferwerda , Stephen H. Westin , Randall C. Smith , Richard Pawlicki, Effects of rendering on shape perception in automobile design, Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, August 07-08, 2004, Los Angeles, California [doi>10.1145/1012551.1012570]
• 3: Fleming, R. W., Torralba, A., and Adelson, E. H. 2004. Specular reflections and the perception of shape. Journal of Vision 4(9), 798--820.
• 4: Amy Gooch , Bruce Gooch , Peter Shirley , Elaine Cohen, A non-photorealistic lighting model for automatic technical illustration, Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.447-452, July 1998 [doi>10.1145/280814.280950]
• 5: Victoria Interrante , Chester Grosch, Strategies for effectively visualizing 3D flow with volume LIC, Proceedings of the 8th conference on Visualization '97, p.421-ff., October 18-24, 1997, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
• 6: Victoria Interrante , Henry Fuchs , Stephen Pizer, Enhancing Transparent Skin Surfaces with Ridge and Valley Lines, Proceedings of the 6th conference on Visualization '95, p.52, October 29-November 03, 1995
• 7: Victoria Interrante, Illustrating surface shape in volume data via principal direction-driven 3D line integral convolution, Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.109-116, August 1997 [doi>10.1145/258734.258796]
• 8: Sunghee Kim , Haleh Hagh-Shenas , Victoria Interrante, Conveying three-dimensional shape with texture, Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, August 07-08, 2004, Los Angeles, California [doi>10.1145/1012551.1012572]
• 9: Koenderink, J. J., and Andrea, J. D. 1982. The shape of smooth objects and the way contours end. Perception 11(2), 129--137.
• 10: Koenderink, J. J., and Van Doorn, A. J. 2003. The visual neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, ch. 72, 1090--1105.
• 11: Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., and Kappers, A. M. 1992. Surface perception in pictures. Percept Psychophys. 52(5), 487--96.
• 12: Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., and C. Christou, L. J. 1996. Perturbation study of shading in pictures. Perception 25(9), 1009--1026.
• 13: Koenderink, J. J. 1984. What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception 13, 321--330.
• 14: Richards, W. A., Koenderink, J. J., and Hoffman, D. D. 1987. Inferring three-dimensional shapes from two-dimensional silhouettes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4 (July), 1168--1175.
• 15: Susan F. te Pas , Sylvia C. Pont, A comparison of material and illumination discrimination performance for real rough, real smooth and computer generated smooth spheres, Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, August 26-28, 2005, A Coroña, Spain [doi>10.1145/1080402.1080415]
• 16: Todd, T. J., and Reichel, F. D. 1990. Visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from double-projected contour patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology 16(3), 665--674.
• 17: Todd, J. T., Norman, J. F., Koenderink, J. J., and Kappers, A. M. 1997. Effects of texture, illumination, and surface reflectance on stereoscopic shape perception. Perception 26(7), 807--22.
• 18: Wichmann, F., A., and Hill, N. J. 2001. The psychometric function: I. fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit. Perception and Psychophysics 63(8), 1293--1313.
• 19: Wichmann, F. A., and Hill, N. J. 2001. The psychometric function: li. bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception and Psychophysics 63(8), 1314--1329.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  J. Computer Applications
  J.6 COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING
      Subjects: Computer-aided design (CAD)

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.7 Three-Dimensional Graphics and Realism
          Subjects: Color, shading, shadowing, and texture

Keywords:
illumination, phong, shape from shading, shape perception