A perceptive evaluation of volume rendering techniques

ABSTRACT

The display of space filling data is still a challenge for the community of visualization. Direct Volume Rendering (DVR) is one of the most important techniques developed to achieve direct perception of such volumetric data. It is based on semi-transparent representations, where the data are accumulated in a depth-dependent order. However, it produces images that may be difficult to understand, and thus several techniques have been proposed so as to improve its effectiveness, using for instance lighting models or simpler representations (e.g. Maximum Intensity Projection). In this paper we present two perceptual studies that question how DVR meets its goals, in either static or dynamic context. We show that a static representation is highly ambiguous, even in simple cases, but this can be counterbalanced by use of dynamic cues, i.e. motion parallax, provided that the rendering parameters are correctly tuned.

REFERENCES

• 1: Anderson, B. L. 1997. A theory of illusory lightness and transparency in monocular and binocular images: the role of contour junctions. Perception 26, 4, 419--453.
• 2: David Ebert , Penny Rheingans, Volume illustration: non-photorealistic rendering of volume models, Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '00, p.195-202, October 2000, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
• 3: Klaus Engel , Martin Kraus , Thomas Ertl, High-quality pre-integrated volume rendering using hardware-accelerated pixel shading, Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/EUROGRAPHICS workshop on Graphics hardware, p.9-16, August 2001, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/383507.383515]
• 4: Fulvio, J. M., Singh, M., and Maloney, L. T. 2006. Combining achromatic and chromatic cues to transparency. J Vis 6, 8, 760--776.
• 5: Gerbino, W., Stultiens, C. I., Troost, J. M., and De Weert, C. M. 1990. Transparent layer constancy. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16, 1 (Feb), 3--20.
• 6: Bill Hibbard, Confessions of a visualization skeptic, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.34 n.3, p.11-13, Aug. 2000 [doi>10.1145/359293.359299]
• 7: Victoria Interrante , Henry Fuchs , Stephen M. Pizer, Conveying the 3D Shape of Smoothly Curving Transparent Surfaces via Texture, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, v.3 n.2, p.98-117, April 1997 [doi>10.1109/2945.597794]
• 8: James T. Kajiya , Brian P Von Herzen, Ray tracing volume densities, Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.165-174, January 1984
• 9: Kasrai, R., and Kingdom, F. A. 2001. Precision, accuracy, and range of perceived achromatic transparency. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 18, 1 (Jan), 1--11.
• 10: Kaufman, A., and Mueller, K. 2005. The Visualization Handbook, ch. 7, 127--174.
• 11: Marta Kersten , James Stewart , Niko Troje , Randy Ellis, Enhancing Depth Perception in Translucent Volumes, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, v.12 n.5, p.1117-1124, September 2006 [doi>10.1109/TVCG.2006.139]
• 12: Philippe Lacroute , Marc Levoy, Fast volume rendering using a shear-warp factorization of the viewing transformation, Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.451-458, July 1994 [doi>10.1145/192161.192283]
• 13: Marc Levoy, Display of Surfaces from Volume Data, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, v.8 n.3, p.29-37, May 1988 [doi>10.1109/38.511]
• 14: Masin, S. C. 2006. Test of models of achromatic transparency. Perception 35, 12, 1611--1624.
• 15: Nelson Max, Optical Models for Direct Volume Rendering, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, v.1 n.2, p.99-108, June 1995 [doi>10.1109/2945.468400]
• 16: Metelli, F. 1974. The perception of transparency. Sci Am 230, 4 (Apr), 90--98.
• 17: Mora, B., and Ebert, D. S. 2004. Instant volumetric understanding with order-independent volume rendering. Comput. Graph. Forum 23, 3, 489--498.
• 18: Ken Perlin, An image synthesizer, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.19 n.3, p.287-296, Jul. 1985
• 19: Hanspeter Pfister , Bill Lorensen , Will Schroeder , Chandrajit Bajaj , Gordon Kindlmann, The transfer function bake-off (panel session), Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '00, p.523-526, October 2000, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
• 20: Roettger, S., Guthe, S., Weiskopf, D., Ertl, T., and Strasser, W., 2003. Smart hardware-accelerated volume rendering.
• 21: Ropinski, T., Steinicke, F., and Hinrichs, K. H. 2006. Visually supporting depth perception in angiography imaging. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Smart Graphics (SG06), Springer, Vancouver, 93--104.
• 22: Paolo Sabella, A rendering algorithm for visualizing 3D scalar fields, Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.51-58, June 1988
• 23: Sears, C. R., and Pylyshyn, Z. W. 2000. Multiple object tracking and attentional processing. Can J Exp Psychol 54, 1 (Mar), 1--14.
• 24: Singh, M., and Anderson, B. L. 2002. Toward a perceptual theory of transparency. Psychol Rev 109, 3 (Jul), 492--519.
• 25: Singh, M. 2004. Lightness constancy through transparency: internal consistency in layered surface representations. Vision Res 44, 15, 1827--1842.
• 26: Wallach, H., and O'Connell, D. N. 1953. The kinetic depth effect. J Exp Psychol 45, 4 (Apr), 205--217.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.3 Picture/Image Generation
          Subjects: Display algorithms

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.8 Applications

  J. Computer Applications
  J.2 PHYSICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING

Keywords:
Direct Volume Rendering, perception of transparency, static and dynamic cues