A digital family calendar in the home: lessons from field trials of LINC

ABSTRACT

Digital family calendars have the potential to help families coordinate, yet they must be designed to easily fit within existing routines or they will simply not be used. To understand the critical factors affecting digital family calendar design, we extended LINC, an inkable family calendar to include ubiquitous access, and then conducted a month-long field study with four families. Adoption and use of LINC during the study demonstrated that LINC successfully supported the families' existing calendaring routines without disrupting existing successful social practices. Families also valued the additional features enabled by LINC. For example, several primary schedulers felt that ubiquitous access positively increased involvement by additional family members in the calendaring routine. The field trials also revealed some unexpected findings, including the importance of mobility---both within and outside the home---for the Tablet PC running LINC.

REFERENCES

• 1: Beech, S., Geelhoed, E., Murphy, R., Parker, J., Sellen, A., and Shaw, K. The Lifestyles of Working Parents. Report HPL-2003-88R1, HP Labs, (2004).
• 2: A.J. Bernheim Brush , Tammara Combs Turner, A survey of personal and household scheduling, Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, November 06-09, 2005, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/1099203.1099263]
• 3: Andy Crabtree , Terry Hemmings , Tom Rodden , John Mariani, Informing the development of calendar systems for domestic use, Proceedings of the eighth conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, p.119-138, September 14-18, 2003, Helsinki, Finland
• 4: Stephan Hoefnagels , Erik Geelhoed , Pieter Jan Stappers , Aldo Hoeben , Remko van der Lugt, Friction in scheduling and coordinating lives of families: designing from an interaction metaphor, Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, August 01-04, 2004, Cambridge, MA, USA [doi>10.1145/1013115.1013170]
• 5: Karen Holtzblatt , Sandra Jones, Conducting and analyzing a contextual interview (excerpt), Human-computer interaction: toward the year 2000, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1995
• 6: Kelley, J. F., and Chapanis, A. How professional persons keep their calendars, Journal Occupational Psychology, Vol. 55 (1982), 241--256
• 7: Christine M. Kincaid , Pierre B. Dupont , A. R. Kaye, Electronic calendars in the office: an assessment of user needs and current technology, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.3 n.1, p.89-102, Jan. 1985 [doi>10.1145/3864.3868]
• 8: Leslie. L., Anderson, E., and Branson, M. Responsibility for Children: The Role of Gender and Employment, Journal of Family Issues, 12(2), Sage Publications (1991), 197--210.
• 9: Carman Neustaedter , A. J. Bernheim Brush, "LINC-ing" the family: the participatory design of an inkable family calendar, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada [doi>10.1145/1124772.1124796]
• 10: Neustaedter, C., Brush, A., and Greenberg, S. "The Calendar is Crucial": Coordination and Awareness through the Family Calendar, Report 2006-839-32, Dept Computer Science, University of Calgary.
• 11: Carman Neustaedter , Kathryn Elliot , Saul Greenberg, Interpersonal awareness in the domestic realm, Proceedings of the 20th conference of the computer-human interaction special interest group (CHISIG) of Australia on Computer-human interaction: design: activities, artefacts and environments, November 20-24, 2006, Sydney, Australia [doi>10.1145/1228175.1228182]
• 12: Leysia Ann Palen, Calendars on the new frontier: challenges of groupware technology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, 1998
• 13: Payne, S. Understanding Calendar Use, Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 8, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1993), 83--100
• 14: Catherine Plaisant , Aaron Clamage , Hilary Browne Hutchinson , Benjamin B. Bederson , Allison Druin, Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.13 n.3, p.313-346, September 2006 [doi>10.1145/1183456.1183458]
• 15: Sellen, A., Hyams, J., and Eardley, R. The Everyday Problems of Working Parents, Report HPL-2004-37, HP Labs, 2004.
• 16: James Tam , Saul Greenberg, A framework for asynchronous change awareness in collaborative documents and workspaces, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.64 n.7, p.583-598, July 2006 [doi>10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.02.004]
• 17: Alex S. Taylor , Laurel Swan, Artful systems in the home, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055060]
• 18: Zimmerman, T., Haddock, S., Ziemba, S., and Rust, A. Family Organizational Labor. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 13(2--3) (2001), 65--90.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces

Keywords:
awareness, calendars, coordination, family, home