ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
EMPIRICISM VERSUS JUDGEMENT: COMPARING USER INTERFACE EVALUATION METHODS ON A NEW TELEPHONE-BASED INTERFACE
Full text PdfPdf (224 KB)
Source ACM SIGCHI Bulletin archive
Volume 23 ,  Issue 4  (October 1991) table of contents
Pages: 58 - 59  
Year of Publication: 1991
ISSN:0736-6906
Authors
Heather Desurvire  NYNEX Science and Technology
Debbie Lawrence  NYNEX Science and Technology
Michael Atwood  NYNEX Science and Technology
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 36,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/126729.1056062
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In an attempt to reduce the time and cost of laboratory usability testing, new techniques for evaluating user interfaces are being developed by human factors researchers. In one such technique, heuristic evaluation (Nielsen and Molich, 1990), experts evaluate interfaces using pre-established usability guidelines. The current study attempts to test the heuristic method of evaluation under several conditions and user interface (UI) experts' "best guess" predictions, for comparing to laboratory performance testing results.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Smith, S. L. and Mosier, J. N. <i>Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software.</i> Report MTR-10090, The MITRE Corp, Bedford, MA, August 1986.

CITED BY  8
Collaborative Colleagues:
Heather Desurvire: colleagues
Debbie Lawrence: colleagues
Michael Atwood: colleagues