|
ABSTRACT
In an attempt to reduce the time and cost of laboratory usability testing, new techniques for evaluating user interfaces are being developed by human factors researchers. In one such technique, heuristic evaluation (Nielsen and Molich, 1990), experts evaluate interfaces using pre-established usability guidelines. The current study attempts to test the heuristic method of evaluation under several conditions and user interface (UI) experts' "best guess" predictions, for comparing to laboratory performance testing results.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Smith, S. L. and Mosier, J. N. <i>Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software.</i> Report MTR-10090, The MITRE Corp, Bedford, MA, August 1986.
|
CITED BY 8
|
|
Claire-Marie Karat , Robert Campbell , Tarra Fiegel, Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.397-404, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Mack , Jakob Nielsen, Usability inspection methods: report on a workshop held at CHI'92, Monterey, CA, May 3–4, 1992, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, v.25 n.1, p.28-33, Jan. 1993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|