ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Bus access optimisation for FlexRay-based distributed embedded systems
Full text PdfPdf (195 KB)
Source Design, Automation, and Test in Europe archive
Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe table of contents
Nice, France
SESSION: Communication synthesis under timing constraints table of contents
Pages: 51 - 56  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-3-9810801-2-4
Authors
Traian Pop  Linköping University, Sweden
Paul Pop  Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
Petru Eles  Linköping University, Sweden
Zebo Peng  Linköping University, Sweden
Sponsors
: IEEE Council on Electronic Design Automation (CEDA)
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
: The EDA Consortium
EDAA : European Design and Automation Association
RAS : RAS
: The IEEE Computer Society TTTC
: ECSI
Publisher
EDA Consortium  San Jose, CA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

FlexRay will very likely become the de-facto standard for in-vehicle communications. Its main advantage is the combination of high speed static and dynamic transmission of messages. In our previous work we have shown that not only the static but also the dynamic segment can be used for hard-real time communication in a deterministic manner. In this paper, we propose techniques for optimising the FlexRay bus access mechanism of a distributed system, so that the hard real-time deadlines are met for all the tasks and messages in the system. We have evaluated the proposed techniques using extensive experiments.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Berwanger, M. Peller, R. Griessbach, "A New High Performance Data Bus System for Safety-Related Applications", http://www.byteflight.de, 2000.
 
2
R. Bosch GmbH, CAN Specification Version 2.0, 1991.
 
3
G. Cena, A. Valenzano, "Performance analysis of Byteflight networks", Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, 157--166, 2004.
 
4
E. G. Coffman Jr., R. L. Graham, "Optimal Scheduling for two Processor Systems", Acta Informatica, 1, 1972.
5
 
6
FlexRay homepage: http://www.flexray-group.com, 2006.
 
7
ISO, "Road Vehicles - Controller Area Network (CAN) - Part 4: Time Triggered Communication", Standard ISO/CD 11898-4, International Organization for Standardization, 2001.
 
8
S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, M. P. Vecchi, "Optimisation by simulated annealing", Science, 220, 671--680, 1983.
 
9
H. Kopetz, G. Bauer, "The time-triggered architecture", Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(1), 112--126, 2003.
 
10
 
11
K. Tindell, A. Burns, A. Wellings, "Calculating CAN Message Response Times", Control Engineering Practice, 3(8), 1163--1169, 1995.
 
12
 
13
 
14
Collaborative Colleagues:
Traian Pop: colleagues
Paul Pop: colleagues
Petru Eles: colleagues
Zebo Peng: colleagues