|
ABSTRACT
Traditional means of observing the ocean, like fixed mooring stations and radar systems, are difficult and expensive to deploy and provide coarse-grained and data measurements of currents and waves. In this paper, we explore the use of inexpensive wireless drifters as an alternative flexible infrastructure for fine-grained ocean monitoring. Surface drifters are designed specifically to move passively with the flow of water on the ocean surface and they are able to acquire sensor readings and GPS-generated positions at regular intervals. We view the fleet of drifters as a wireless ad-hoc sensor network with two types of nodes:i) a few powerful drifters with satellite connectivity, acting as mobile base-stations, and ii)a large number of low-power drifters with short-range acoustic or radio connectivity. Using real datasets from the Gulf of Maine (US) and the Liverpool Bay (UK), we study connectivity and uniformity properties of the ad-hoc mobile sensor network. We investigate the effect of deployment strategy, weather conditions as well as seasonal changes on the ability of drifters to relay readings to the end-users,and to provide sufficient sensing coverage of the monitored area. Our empirical study provides useful insights on how to design distributed routing and in-network processing algorithms tailored for ocean-monitoring sensor networks.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
N. Pettigrew, J. H. Churchill, C. Janzen, L. Mangum, R. Signell, A. Thomas, D. Townsend, J. Wallinga, and H. Xue, "The kinematic and hydrographic structure of the gulf of maine coastal current," Deep Sea Research II vol. 52, pp. 2369--2391, 2005.
|
| |
2
|
e. a. J. Gould, "Argo pro ?ling ?oats bring new era of in situ ocean observations," EOS vol. 85, no. 19, pp. 179--184, 2004.
|
| |
3
|
U. of Washington.
|
| |
4
|
R. P. LaBelle, J. Price, W. Johnson, and C. Marshall, "Surface drifter deployment in experimental oil spill."
|
 |
5
|
I. Vasilescu , K. Kotay , D. Rus , M. Dunbabin , P. Corke, Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 02-04, 2005, San Diego, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1098918.1098936]
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
B. Zhang, G. Sukhatme, and A. Requicha, "Adaptive sampling for marine microorganism monitoring," in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2004.
|
| |
8
|
I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, "Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges," Ad Hoc Networks vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 257--279, 2005.
|
| |
9
|
J. Proakis, E. Sozer, J. Rice, and M. Stojanovic, "Shallow water acoustic networks," IEEE Communications Magazine vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 114--119, 2001.
|
| |
10
|
M. Stojanovic, "Recent advances in high-speed underwater acoustic communication," IEEE Journal of Oceanographic Engineering vol. 21, pp. 125--136, 1996.
|
| |
11
|
E. Sozer, M. Stojanovic, and J. Proakis, "Underwater acoustic networks," IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 72--83, 2000.
|
| |
12
|
|
|