ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Revenue analysis of a family of ranking rules for keyword auctions
Full text PdfPdf (193 KB)
Source
Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: The price is right table of contents
Pages: 50 - 56  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-653-0
Authors
Sébastien Lahaie  Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
David M. Pennock  Yahoo! Research, New York, NY
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1250910.1250918
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Keyword auctions lie at the core of the business models of today's leading search engines. Advertisers bid for placement alongside search results, and are charged for clicks on their ads. Advertisers are typically ranked according to a score that takes into account their bids and potential click-through rates. We consider a family of ranking rules that contains those typically used to model Yahoo! and Google's auction designs as special cases. We find that in general neither of these is necessarily revenue-optimal in equilibrium, and that the choice of ranking rule can be guided by considering the correlation between bidders' values and click-through rates. We propose a simple approach to determine a revenue-optimal ranking rule within our family, taking into account effects on advertiser satisfaction and user experience. We illustrate the approach using Monte-Carlo simulations based on distributions fitted to Yahoo! bid and click-through rate data for a high-volume keyword.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
T. Börgers, I. Cox, M. Pesendorfer, andV. Petricek. Equilibrium bids in auctions of sponsored links: Theory and evidence. Working paper, November 2006.
 
3
B. Edelman, M. Ostrovsky, and M. Schwarz. Internet advertising and the Generalized Second Price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review, forthcoming.
 
4
 
5
G. Iyengar and A. Kumar. Characterizing optimal keyword auctions. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, Ann Arbor, MI, 2006.
 
6
 
7
V. Krishna. Auction Theory . Academic Press, 2002.
8
 
9
R. B. Myerson. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6(1), February 1981.
 
10
 
11
H. R. Varian. Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, forthcoming.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Sébastien Lahaie: colleagues
David M. Pennock: colleagues