|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
In this work, we consider the problems of testing whether adistribution over (0,1n) is k-wise (resp. (ε,k)-wise) independentusing samples drawn from that distribution. For the problem of distinguishing k-wise independent distributions from those that are δ-far from k-wise independence in statistical distance, we upper bound the number ofrequired samples by Õ(nk/δ2) and lower bound it by Ω(nk-1/2/δ) (these bounds hold for constantk, and essentially the same bounds hold for general k). Toachieve these bounds, we use Fourier analysis to relate adistribution's distance from k-wise independence to its biases, a measure of the parity imbalance it induces on a setof variables. The relationships we derive are tighter than previouslyknown, and may be of independent interest. To distinguish (ε,k)-wise independent distributions from thosethat are δ-far from (ε,k)-wise independence in statistical distance, we upper bound thenumber of required samples by O(k log n / δ2ε2) and lower bound it by Ω(√ k log n / 2k(ε+δ)√ log 1/2k(ε+δ)). Although these bounds are anexponential improvement (in terms of n and k) over thecorresponding bounds for testing k-wise independence, we give evidence thatthe time complexity of testing (ε,k)-wise independence isunlikely to be poly(n,1/ε,1/δ) for k=Θ(log n),since this would disprove a plausible conjecture concerning the hardness offinding hidden cliques in random graphs. Under the conjecture, ourresult implies that for, say, k = log n and ε = 1 / n0.99,there is a set of (ε,k)-wise independent distributions, and a set of distributions at distance δ=1/n0.51 from (ε,k)-wiseindependence, which are indistinguishable by polynomial time algorithms. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
Collaborative Colleagues:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||