ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Testing k-wise and almost k-wise independence
Full text PdfPdf (341 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: Session 10A table of contents
Pages: 496 - 505  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-631-8
Authors
Noga Alon  Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv , Israel
Alexandr Andoni  MIT, Cambridge, MA
Tali Kaufman  MIT, Cambridge, MA
Kevin Matulef  MIT, Cambridge, MA
Ronitt Rubinfeld  MIT, Cambridge, MA
Ning Xie  State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Amherst, NY
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 84,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1250790.1250863
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this work, we consider the problems of testing whether adistribution over (0,1n) is k-wise (resp. (ε,k)-wise) independentusing samples drawn from that distribution.

For the problem of distinguishing k-wise independent distributions from those that are δ-far from k-wise independence in statistical distance, we upper bound the number ofrequired samples by Õ(nk2) and lower bound it by Ω(nk-1/2/δ) (these bounds hold for constantk, and essentially the same bounds hold for general k). Toachieve these bounds, we use Fourier analysis to relate adistribution's distance from k-wise independence to its biases, a measure of the parity imbalance it induces on a setof variables. The relationships we derive are tighter than previouslyknown, and may be of independent interest.

To distinguish (ε,k)-wise independent distributions from thosethat are δ-far from (ε,k)-wise independence in statistical distance, we upper bound thenumber of required samples by O(k log n / δ2ε2) and lower bound it by Ω(√ k log n / 2k(ε+δ)√ log 1/2k(ε+δ)). Although these bounds are anexponential improvement (in terms of n and k) over thecorresponding bounds for testing k-wise independence, we give evidence thatthe time complexity of testing (ε,k)-wise independence isunlikely to be poly(n,1/ε,1/δ) for k=Θ(log n),since this would disprove a plausible conjecture concerning the hardness offinding hidden cliques in random graphs. Under the conjecture, ourresult implies that for, say, k = log n and ε = 1 / n0.99,there is a set of (ε,k)-wise independent distributions, and a set of distributions at distance δ=1/n0.51 from (ε,k)-wiseindependence, which are indistinguishable by polynomial time algorithms.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
N. Alon. Problems and results in extremal combinatorics (Part I). Discrete Math., 273:31--53, 2003.
 
2
 
3
N. Alon, O. Goldreich, J. Hastad, and R. Peralta. Simple constructions of almost k-wise independent random variables. Random Structures and Algorithms, 3(3):289--304, 1992. Earlier version in FOCS'90.
 
4
 
5
 
6
N. Alon and J. Spencer. The Probabilistic Method. John Wiley and Sons, second edition, 2000.
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
W. Beckner. Inequalities in fourier analysis. Annals of Mathematics, 102:159--182, 1975.
 
11
S. Bernstein. The Theory of Probabilities. Gostehizdat Publishing House, Moscow, 1946.
 
12
A. Bonami. Etude des coefficients fourier des fonctiones de l<sup>p</sup>(g). Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 20(2):335--402, 1970.
 
13
B. Chor, J. Friedman, O. Goldreich, J. Hastad, S. Rudich, and R. Smolensky. The bit extraction problem and t-resilient functions. In Proc. 26th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 396--407, 1985.
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
O. Goldreich and D. Ron. On testing expansion in bounded-degree graphs. Technical Report TR00-020, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, 2000.
 
18
M. Jerrum. Large cliques elude the metropolis process. Random Structures and Algorithms, 3(4):347--359, 1992.
 
19
A. Joffe. On a set of almost deterministic k-independent random variables. Annals of Probability, 2:161--162, 1974.
 
20
21
 
22
R.M. Karp. The probabilistic analysis of some combinatorial search algorithms. In JF. Traub, editor, Algorithms and Complexity: New directions and Recent Results, pages 1--19, New York, 1976. Academic Press.
 
23
 
24
 
25
26


Collaborative Colleagues:
Noga Alon: colleagues
Alexandr Andoni: colleagues
Tali Kaufman: colleagues
Kevin Matulef: colleagues
Ronitt Rubinfeld: colleagues
Ning Xie: colleagues