ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An efficient parallel repetition theorem for Arthur-Merlin games
Full text PdfPdf (287 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: Session 9A table of contents
Pages: 420 - 429  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-631-8
Authors
Rafael Pass  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Muthuramakrishnan Venkitasubramaniam  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 59,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1250790.1250853
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We show a parallel-repetition theorem for constant-round Arthur-Merlin Games, using an efficient reduction. As a consequence, we show that parallel repetition reduces the soundness-error at an optimal rate (up to a negligible factor) in constant-round public-coin argument systems, and constant-round public-coinproofs of knowledge. The former of these results resolves an open questionposed by Bellare, Impagliazzo and Naor (FOCS '97).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
[4] M. Blum. How to prove a Theorem So No One Else Can Claim It. Proc. of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Berkeley, California, USA, pages 1444-1451, 1986.
 
5
 
6
[6] R. Canetti and S. Halevi and M. Steiner. Hardness Amplification of Weakly Verifiable Puzzles. In 2nd TCC, Springer LNCS 3876, pages 17-33, 2005.
 
7
[7] O. Goldreich and R. Impagliazzo and L. A. Levin and R. Venkatesan and D. Zuckerman. Security Preserving Amplification of Hardness. In 31th FOCS, pages 318-326, 1990.
8
 
9
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
[15] S. Goldwasser and S. Micali. Probabilistic Encryption. JCSS, Vol. 28, No 2, pages 270-299, 1984.
16
 
17
 
18
19
 
20
[20] K. Pietrzak and D. Wikström. Parallel Repetition of Computationally Sound Protocols Revisited. To appear in TCC 2007.
 
21
[21] R. Richardson and J. Kilian. On the Concurrent Composition of Zero-Knowledge Proofs. Eurocrypt 99, Springer LNCS 1592, pages 415-431, 1999.
22
 
23
[23] M. Tompa, H. Woll. Random Self-Reducibility and Zero Knowledge Interactive Proofs of Possession of Information. In 28th FOCS, pages 472-482, 1987.
 
24
[24] A. Yao. Theory and Applications of Trapdoor Functions. In 23th FOCS, pages 80-91, 1982.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Rafael Pass: colleagues
Muthuramakrishnan Venkitasubramaniam: colleagues