ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Polynomial flow-cut gaps and hardness of directed cut problems
Full text PdfPdf (233 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: Session 4A table of contents
Pages: 179 - 188  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-631-8
Authors
Julia Chuzhoy  Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ
Sanjeev Khanna  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 53,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1250790.1250817
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study the multicut and the sparsest cut problems in directed graphs. In the multicut problem, we are a given an n-vertex graphG along with k source-sink pairs, and the goal is to find the minimum cardinality subset of edges whose removal separates all source-sink pairs. The sparsest cut problem has the same input, but the goal is to find a subset of edges to delete so as to minimize the ratio of deleted edges to the number of source-sink pairs that are separated by this deletion. The natural linear programming relaxation for multicut corresponds, by LP-duality, to the well-studied maximum (fractional) multicommodity flow problem, whilethe natural LP-relaxation for sparsest cut corresponds to maximum concurrent flow. Therefore, the integrality gap of the linear programming relaxation for multicut/sparsest cut is also the flow-cut gap: the maximum ratio, achievable for any graph,between the maximum flow value and the minimum cost solution for the corresponding cut problem. Starting with the celebrated max flow-mincut theorem of Ford and Fulkerson, flow-cut gaps have played acentral role in combinatorial optimization. For many NP-hard network optimization problems, the best known approximation guarantee corresponds to our understanding of the appropriate flow-cut gap.

Our first result is that the flow-cut gap between maximum multicommodity flow and minimum multicut is ~Ω (n1/7) in directed graphs. We show a similar result for the gap between maximum concurrent flow and sparsest cutin directed graphs. These results improve upon a long-standing lowerbound of Ω(log n) for both types of flow-cut gaps. We notice that these polynomially large flow-cut gaps are in a sharp contrastto the undirected setting where both these flow-cut gaps are knownto be Θ(log n). Our second result is that both directed multicut and sparsest cut are hard to approximate to within a factor of 2Ω(log1-εn) for any constant ε>0,unless NP ⊆ ZPP. This improves upon the recent Ω(log n / log log n)-hardness result for these problems. We also showthat existence of PCP's for NP with perfect completeness, polynomially small soundness, and constant number of queries would imply a polynomial factor hardness of approximation for both these problems. All our results hold for directed acyclic graphs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
 
10
 
11
12
 
13
[13] J. Chuzhoy and S. Khanna. Hardness of Directed Routing with Congestion. ECCC Technical Report TR06-109, August 2006. http://eccc.hpi-web.de/eccc-reports/2006/TR06-109/index.html.
14
 
15
16
 
17
18
 
19
[19] U. Feige and S. Kogan. Hardness of Approximation of the Balanced Complete Bipartite Subgraph Problem. Technical Report MCS04-04, Department of Computer Science and Applied Math., The Weizmann Institute of Science, 2004.
 
20
[20] L. R. Ford, D. R. Fulkerson, 1962. Flows in Networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
 
21
[21] V. Guruswami and K. Talwar. Hardness of Low Congestion Routing in Directed Graphs. ECCC Technical Report TR06-141, November 2006, http://eccc.hpi-web.de/eccc-reports/2006/TR06- 141/index.html.
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
28
 
29
 
30


Collaborative Colleagues:
Julia Chuzhoy: colleagues
Sanjeev Khanna: colleagues