ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
First to market is not everything: an analysis of preferential attachment with fitness
Full text PdfPdf (240 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: Session 3B table of contents
Pages: 135 - 144  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-631-8
Authors
Christian Borgs  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Jennifer Chayes  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Constantinos Daskalakis  University of California: Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Sebastien Roch  University of California: Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1250790.1250812
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The design of algorithms on complex networks, such as routing, ranking or recommendation algorithms, requires a detailed understanding of the growth characteristics of the networks of interest, such as the Internet,the web graph, social networks or online communities. To this end, preferential attachment, in which the popularity (or relevance) of a node is determined by its degree, is a well-known and appealing random graph model, whose predictions are in accordance with experiments on the web graph and several social networks. However, its central assumption, that the popularity of the nodes dependsonly on their degree, is not a realistic one, since every node has potentially some intrinsic quality which can differentiate its attractiveness from other nodes with similar degrees.

In this paper, we provide a rigorous analysis of preferential attachment with fitness, suggested by Bianconi and Barabási and studied by Motwani and Xu, in which the degree of a vertex is scaled by its quality to determine its attractiveness. Including quality considerations in the classical preferential attachment model provides a much more realistic description of many complex networks, such as the web graph, and allows toobserve a much richer behavior in the growth dynamics of these networks. Specifically, depending on the shape of the distributionfrom which the qualities of the vertices are drawn, we observe three distinct phases, namely a first-mover-advantage phase, afit-get-richer phase and an innovation-pays-offphase. We precisely characterize the properties of the quality distribution that result in each of these phases and we computethe exact growth dynamics for each phase. The dynamics provide rich information about the quality of the vertices, which can bevery useful in many practical contexts, including ranking algorithms for the web, recommendation algorithms, as well as thestudy of social networks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K.B. Athreya and P.E. Ney. Branching processes. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 196.
 
2
Albert-László Barabási and Réka Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286:509--512, 1999.
 
3
 
4
Ginestra Bianconi and Albert-László Barabási. Bose-einstein condensation in complex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(24):5632--5635, Jun 2001.
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
Colin Cooper and Alan Frieze. A general model of web graphs, 2001.
 
10
Derek J. de~Solla~Price. Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683):510--515, July 30 1965.
 
11
Eleni Drinea, Mihaela Enachescu, and Michael Mitzenmacher. Variations on random graph models for the Web. Technical Report TR--06--01, Harvard University, 2001.
12
 
13
Abraham Flaxman, Alan M. Frieze, and Trevor I. Fenner. High degree vertices and eigenvalues in the preferential attachment graph. In RANDOM-APPROX, pages 264--274, 2003.
 
14
Nigel Gilbert. A simulation of the structure of academic science. Sociological Research Online, 2(2), 1997.
 
15
Svante Janson. Functional limit theorems for multitype branching processes and generalized Pólya urns. Stochastic Process. Appl., 110(2):177--245, 2004.
 
16
Jon Kleinberg. The emerging intersection of social and technological networks: Open questions and algorithmic challenges. In FOCS, 2006.
 
17
Jon M. Kleinberg, Ravi Kumar, Prabhakar Raghavan, Sridhar Rajagopalan, and Andrew Tomkins. The web as a graph: Measurements, models, and methods. In COCOON, pages 1--17, 1999.
 
18
P.L. Krapivsky and S. Redner. Organization of grwoing random networks. Physical Review E, 63(6):066123--1--066123--14, June 2001.
 
19
 
20
A.J. Lotka. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 16(12):317--323, June 19 1926.
 
21
Michael Mitzenmacher. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Math., 1(2):226--251, 2004.
22
23
24
 
25
Herbert A. Simon. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42(4):425--440, December 1955.
 
26
G. Yule. A mathematical theory of evolution based on the conclusions of dr. j.c. willis. F.R.S. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 213(B):21--87, 1925.
 
27
George K. Zipf. Human Behavior and The Principles of Least Effort. Addison Wesley, Cambridge, MA, 1949.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Christian Borgs: colleagues
Jennifer Chayes: colleagues
Constantinos Daskalakis: colleagues
Sebastien Roch: colleagues