ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Mechanisms for bounding vulnerabilities of processor structures
Full text PdfPdf (418 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Computer Architecture archive
Proceedings of the 34th annual international symposium on Computer architecture table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: Vulnerabilities table of contents
Pages: 506 - 515  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-706-3
Also published in ...
Authors
Niranjan Kumar Soundararajan  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Angshuman Parashar  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Anand Sivasubramaniam  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Sponsors
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 34,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1250662.1250725
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Concern for the increasing susceptibility of processor structures to transient errors has led to several recent research efforts that propose architectural techniques to enhance reliability. However, real systems are typically required to satisfy hard reliability budgets, and barring expensive full-redundancy approaches, none of the proposed solutions treat any reliability budgets or bounds as hard constraints. Meeting vulnerability bounds requires monitoring vulnerabilities of processor structures and taking appropriate actions whenever these bounds are violated. This mandates treating reliability as a first-order microarchitecture design constraint, while optimizing performance as long as reliability requirements are satisfied. This paper makes three key contributions towards this goal: (i) we present a simple infrastructure to monitor and provide upper bounds on the vulnerabilities of key processor structures at cycle-level fidelity; (ii) we propose two distinct control mechanisms - throttling and selective redundancy - to proactively and/or reactively bound the vulnerabilities to any limit specified by the system designer; (iii) within this framework, we propose a novel adaptation of Out-of-Order Commit for vulnerability reduction, which automatically provides additional leverage for the control mechanisms to boost performance while remaining within the reliability budget.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
D. Burger and T. Austin. The SimpleScalar Toolset, Version 3.0. http://www.simplescalar.com.
 
3
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
 
11
12
13
 
14
 
15
16
17
 
18
 
19
J. Shen and M. Lipasti. Modern Processor Design: Fundamentals of Superscalar Processors (Beta Edition). McGraw Hill, 2003.
20
 
21
22
23
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
Niranjan Kumar Soundararajan: colleagues
Angshuman Parashar: colleagues
Anand Sivasubramaniam: colleagues