|
ABSTRACT
There has been considerable recent interest in both hardware andsoftware transactional memory (TM). We present an intermediateapproach, in which hardware serves to accelerate a TM implementation controlled fundamentally by software. Specifically, we describe an alert on update mechanism (AOU) that allows a thread to receive fast, asynchronous notification when previously-identified lines are written by other threads, and a programmable data isolation mechanism (PDI) that allows a thread to hide its speculative writes from other threads, ignoring conflicts, until software decides to make them visible. These mechanisms reduce bookkeeping, validation, and copying overheads without constraining software policy on a host of design decisions. We have used AOU and PDI to implement a hardwareacceleratedsoftware transactional memory system we call RTM. We have also used AOU alone to create a simpler "RTM-Lite". Across a range of microbenchmarks, RTM outperforms RSTM, a publicly available software transactional memory system, by as much as 8.7x (geometric mean of 3.5x) in single-thread mode. At 16 threads, it outperforms RSTM by as much as 5x, with an average speedup of 2x. Performance degrades gracefully when transactions overflow hardware structures. RTM-Lite is slightly faster than RTM for transactions that modify only small objects; full RTM is significantly faster when objects are large. In a strongargument for policy flexibility, we find that the choice between eager (first-access) and lazy (commit-time) conflict detection can lead to significant performance differences in both directions, depending on application characteristics.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
Weihaw Chuang , Satish Narayanasamy , Ganesh Venkatesh , Jack Sampson , Michael Van Biesbrouck , Gilles Pokam , Brad Calder , Osvaldo Colavin, Unbounded page-based transactional memory, Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, October 21-25, 2006, San Jose, California, USA
|
 |
4
|
Peter Damron , Alexandra Fedorova , Yossi Lev , Victor Luchangco , Mark Moir , Daniel Nussbaum, Hybrid transactional memory, Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, October 21-25, 2006, San Jose, California, USA
|
| |
5
|
K. Fraser and T. Harris. Concurrent Programming Without Locks. Submitted for publication, 2004. Available as research.microsoft.com/~tharris/drafts/cpwl-submission.pdf.
|
| |
6
|
R. Guerraoui, M. Herlihy, and B. Pochon. Polymorphic Contention Management in SXM. In Proc. of the 19th Intl. Symp. on Distributed Computing, Cracow, Poland, Sept. 2005.
|
 |
7
|
Lance Hammond , Vicky Wong , Mike Chen , Brian D. Carlstrom , John D. Davis , Ben Hertzberg , Manohar K. Prabhu , Honggo Wijaya , Christos Kozyrakis , Kunle Olukotun, Transactional Memory Coherence and Consistency, Proceedings of the 31st annual international symposium on Computer architecture, p.102, June 19-23, 2004, München, Germany
|
 |
8
|
Maurice Herlihy , Victor Luchangco , Mark Moir , William N. Scherer, III, Software transactional memory for dynamic-sized data structures, Proceedings of the twenty-second annual symposium on Principles of distributed computing, p.92-101, July 13-16, 2003, Boston, Massachusetts
[doi> 10.1145/872035.872048]
|
 |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
Sanjeev Kumar , Michael Chu , Christopher J. Hughes , Partha Kundu , Anthony Nguyen, Hybrid transactional memory, Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming, March 29-31, 2006, New York, New York, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1122971.1123003]
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
V. J. Marathe, W. N. Scherer III, and M. L. Scott. Adaptive Software Transactional Memory. In Proc. of the 19th Intl. Symp. on Distributed Computing, Cracow, Poland, Sept. 2005.
|
| |
13
|
V. J. Marathe, M. F. Spear, C. Heriot, A. Acharya, D. Eisenstat, W. N. Scherer III, and M. L. Scott. Lowering the Overhead of Software Transactional Memory. In ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Transactional Computing, Ottawa, ON, Canada, June 2006. Expanded version available as TR 893, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Rochester, Mar. 2006.
|
 |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
Milo M. K. Martin , Daniel J. Sorin , Bradford M. Beckmann , Michael R. Marty , Min Xu , Alaa R. Alameldeen , Kevin E. Moore , Mark D. Hill , David A. Wood, Multifacet's general execution-driven multiprocessor simulator (GEMS) toolset, ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, v.33 n.4, November 2005
[doi> 10.1145/1105734.1105747]
|
| |
16
|
K. E. Moore, J. Bobba, M. J. Moravan, M. D. Hill, and D. A. Wood. LogTM: Log-based Transactional Memory. In Proc. of the 12th Intl. Symp. on High Performance Computer Architecture, Austin, TX, Feb. 2006.
|
| |
17
|
J. E. B. Moss. Open Nested Transactions: Semantics and Support. In Proc. of the 4th IEEE Workshop on Memory Performance Issues, Austin, TX, Feb. 2006.
|
| |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
 |
22
|
Bratin Saha , Ali-Reza Adl-Tabatabai , Richard L. Hudson , Chi Cao Minh , Benjamin Hertzberg, McRT-STM: a high performance software transactional memory system for a multi-core runtime, Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming, March 29-31, 2006, New York, New York, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1122971.1123001]
|
 |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
A. Shriraman, M. F. Spear, H. Hossain, S. Dwarkadas, and M. L. Scott. An Integrated Hardware-Software Approach to Flexible Transactional Memory. TR 910, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Rochester, Dec. 2006.
|
| |
26
|
A. Shriraman, V. J. Marathe, S. Dwarkadas, M. L. Scott, D. Eisenstat, C. Heriot, W. N. Scherer III, and M. F. Spear. Hardware Acceleration of Software Transactional Memory. In ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Transactional Computing, Ottawa, ON, Canada, June 2006. Expanded version available as TR 887, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Rochester, Dec. 2005, revised Mar. 2006.
|
| |
27
|
M. F. Spear, V. J. Marathe, W. N. Scherer III, and M. L. Scott. Conflict Detection and Validation Strategies for Software Transactional Memory. In Proc. of the 20th Intl. Symp. on Distributed Computing, Stockholm, Sweden, Sept. 2006.
|
 |
28
|
Michael F. Spear , Arrvindh Shriraman , Hemayet Hossain , Sandhya Dwarkadas , Michael L. Scott, Alert-on-update: a communication aid for shared memory multiprocessors, Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming, March 14-17, 2007, San Jose, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1229428.1229452]
|
 |
29
|
Michael F. Spear , Arrvindh Shriraman , Luke Dalessandro , Sandhya Dwarkadas , Michael L. Scott, Nonblocking transactions without indirection using alert-on-update, Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures, June 09-11, 2007, San Diego, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1248377.1248414]
|
| |
30
|
M. F. Spear, V. J. Marathe, L. Dalessandro, and M. L. Scott. Privatization Techniques for Software Transactional Memory. TR 915, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Rochester, Feb. 2007.
|
CITED BY 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calin Cascaval , Colin Blundell , Maged Michael , Harold W. Cain , Peng Wu , Stefanie Chiras , Siddhartha Chatterjee, Software Transactional Memory: Why is it Only a Research Toy?, Queue, v.6 n.5, September 2008
|
|
|
Calin Cascaval , Colin Blundell , Maged Michael , Harold W. Cain , Peng Wu , Stefanie Chiras , Siddhartha Chatterjee, Software transactional memory: why is it only a research toy?, Communications of the ACM, v.51 n.11, November 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|