Exploring the causes and effects of inter-agency information sharing systems adoption in the anti/counter-terrorism and disaster management domains

ABSTRACT

The present paper presents a study that seeks the antecedents of inter-agency information sharing systems adoption and the effects of using such systems on the information sharing practice among anti/counter-terrorism and disaster management agencies. Based on traditional IT acceptance theory, social exchange theory, and distributional justice perspective, the study presents a set of potential determinants of inter-agency information sharing systems adoption and propositions about post-adoption behaviors of user agencies. Also presented in this paper are the results from a preliminary study that administered a survey questionnaire to emergency responders such as law enforcement personnel, intelligence agents, firefighters, emergency medical staffs, and other government employees in the emergency management area. In the preliminary study, the relationships between inter-agency information sharing and hypothesized antecedents including perceived benefits, information assurance, organizational norm, and IT infrastructure are examined.

The results from the preliminary study revealed that the current inter-agency information sharing systems use does not reflect social and operational environments of emergency management organizations. While technical environments such as other agencies' information assurance level and technical standards seem to encourage information sharing systems use, other factors such as perceived task support benefits, organizational norms, and institutional pressure to share information have no or negligible association with the systems use. The paper discusses about the findings and proposes a refined framework and model to understand inter-agency information sharing systems adoption and use.

REFERENCES

• 1: Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies? Decision Sciences, 30 (2). 361--391.
• 2: Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2). 179--211.
• 3: Barclay, D., Thompson, R. and Higgins, C. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use an Illustration. Technology Studies, 2 (2). 285--309.
• 4: Barley, S. R. Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (1). 78--108.
• 5: Barney, J. B. The Resource-Based Theory of the Firm. Organization Science, 7 (5). 469.
• 6: Baseline. Post-9/11, a New Push for Information Sharing Baseline Magazine, 2006, 67--73.
• 7: M. Bensaou , Erin Anderson, Buyer-Supplier Relations in Industrial Markets: When Do Buyers Risk Making Idiosyncratic Investments?, Organization Science, v.10 n.4, p.460-481, April 1999 [doi>10.1287/orsc.10.4.460]
• 8: Anandhi S. Bharadwaj, A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly, v.24 n.1, p.169-196, March 2000 [doi>10.2307/3250983]
• 9: Erik Brynjolfsson , Michael D. Smith, Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers, Management Science, v.46 n.4, p.563-585, April 2000 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.46.4.563.12061]
• 10: Chin, W. W. The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling, in Marcoulides, G. A. ed. Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, 1998, 295--336.
• 11: Wynne W. Chin , Barbara L. Marcolin , Peter R. Newsted, A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study, Information Systems Research, v.14 n.2, p.189-217, June 2003 [doi>10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018]
• 12: Choudhury, V. Strategic choices in the development of interorganizational information systems. Information Systems Research, 8 (1). 1--24.
• 13: Theodore H. Clark , David C. Croson , William T. Schiano, A Hierarchical Model of Supply-Chain Integration: Information Sharing and Operational Interdependence in the US Grocery Channel, Information Technology and Management, v.2 n.3, p.261-288, July 2001 [doi>10.1023/A:1011497025090]
• 14: Cropanzano, R. and Mitchell, M. S. Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31 (6). 874--899.
• 15: Crowston, K. A Coordination Theory Approach to Organizational Process Design. Organization Science, 8 (2).
• 16: Lynda Davies , Geoff Mitchell, The Dual Nature of the Impact of IT on Organizational Transformations, Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.2 Working Conference on Information Technology and New Emergent Forms of Organizations: Transforming Organizations with Information Technology, p.243-261, August 11-13, 1994
• 17: Dawes, S. S., Birkland, T., Tayi, G. K. and Schneider, C. A. Information, Technology, and Coordination: Lessons from the World Trade Center Response, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY 2004.
• 18: Eng, T.-Y. An Investigation into the Mediating Role of Cross-functional Coordination on the Linkage between Organizational Norms and SCM Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 35. 762--773.
• 19: Gassenheimer, J. B., Houston, F. S. and Davis, J. C. The role of economic value, social value, and perceptions of fairness in interorganizational relationship retention decisions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26 (4). 322--337.
• 20: Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. Trust and TAM in Online Shopping:An integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1). 51--90.
• 21: Griffith;, D. A., Myers;, M. B. and Harvey, M. G. An Investigation of National Culture's Influence on Relationship and Knowledge Resources in Interorganizational Relationships Between Japan and the United States. Journal of International Marketing, 14(3). 1--32.
• 22: Hall, M. Feds Move to Share Intelligence Faster USA Today, 2006.
• 23: Haque, A. Implementation in a Wired World: Obstacles to Facilitating Information Sharing Procedures in North-Central Alabama. Public Administration Quarterly, 29 (1/2). 110--125.
• 24: Hollander, H. A Social Exchange Approach to Voluntary Cooperation. The American Economic Review, 80 (5). 1157--1167.
• 25: Kean;, T. H. and Hamilton, L. H. The 9/11 Report. St. Martin's Press, New York, 2004.
• 26: Vincent S. Lai , Radha K. Mahapatra, Exploring the research in information technology implementation, Information and Management, v.32 n.4, p.187-201, April 1997 [doi>10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00022-0]
• 27: Ho Geun Lee , Theodore Clark , Kar Yan Tam, Research Report. Can Edi Benefit Adopters?, Information Systems Research, v.10 n.2, p.186-195, February 1999 [doi>10.1287/isre.10.2.186]
• 28: Lee, J., Kim, D. J. and Rao, H. R., An Examination of Trust Effects and Pre-existing Relational Risks in e-Government Services, in the 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems (Best Paper Award), (Omaha, NE, 2005), 1949--1954.
• 29: Lee, J. and Rao, H. R. The Effects of Trusting Beliefs and Perceived Usefulness on Usage Intentions of Potential e-Government Service Users. Decision Support Systems.
• 30: Lee, J. and Rao, H. R. Perceived Risks, Counter-Beliefs, and Intentions to Use Anti-/Counter-Terrorism Websites: An Exploratory Study of Government-Citizens Online Interactions in a Turbulent Environment. Decision Support Systems (in Press).
• 31: JinKyu Lee , Shambhu J. Upadhyaya , H. Raghav Rao , Raj Sharman, Secure knowledge management and the semantic web, Communications of the ACM, v.48 n.12, December 2005 [doi>10.1145/1101779.1101808]
• 32: Li, G., Yan, H., Wang, S. and Xia, Y. Comparative analysis on value of information sharing in supply chains. Supply Chain Management, 10 (1). 34.
• 33: D. Harrison McKnight , Vivek Choudhury , Charles Kacmar, Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology, Information Systems Research, v.13 n.3, p.334-359, September 2002 [doi>10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81]
• 34: Mitchell, K. D. Collaboration and information sharing: An ROI perspective? Public Manager, 31 (1). 59.
• 35: Morgan, R.-M. and Hunt, S.-D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal-of-Marketing, 58 (3). 20--38.
• 36: Orlikowski, W. J. The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3 (3). 398--427.
• 37: Park, I., Lee, J., Rao, H. R. and Upadhyaya, S. J. Emerging Issues for Secure Knowledge Management - Results of a Delphi Study. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - PartA: Systems and Humans, 36 (3). 421--428.
• 38: Srinivasan Raghunathan, Information Sharing in a Supply Chain: A Note on its Value when Demand Is Nonstationary, Management Science, v.47 n.4, p.605-610, April 2001 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.47.4.605.9833]
• 39: Rockart, J. F. and Short, J., E IT in the 1990s: Managing Organizational Interdependence. Sloan Management Review, 30(2). 7--17.
• 40: Sahin, F. and Robinson, E. P. Flow coordination and information sharing in supply chains: Review, implications, and directions for future research. Decision Sciences, 33 (4). 505.
• 41: Soh, C. and Markus, M., How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis, in Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Information Systems, (Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995), 29--41.
• 42: Steinfield, C., Kraut, R. and Plummer, A. The Impact of Interorganizational Networks on Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1 (3).
• 43: Viswanath Venkatesh, Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model, Information Systems Research, v.11 n.4, p.342-365, December 2000 [doi>10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872]
• 44: Viswanath Venkatesh , Fred D. Davis, A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, v.46 n.2, p.186-204, February 2000 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926]
• 45: Peter Weill , Marianne Broadbent, Leveraging the new infrastructure: how market leaders capitalize on information technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1998
• 46: Yamagishi;, T., Jin;, N. and Kiyonari;, T. Bounded Generalized Reciprocity: Ingroup Boasting and Ingroup Favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16. 161--197.
• 47: Kevin Zhu , Kenneth L. Kraemer, Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry, Information Systems Research, v.16 n.1, p.61-84, March 2005 [doi>10.1287/isre.1050.0045]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Asynchronous interaction

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology; Organizational design; Collaborative computing; Web-based interaction; Computer-supported cooperative work; Synchronous interaction; Theory and models

General Terms:
Economics, Management, Security, Standardization, Theory

Keywords:
anti/counter-terrorism, disaster management, information sharing, inter-organizational systems