First generation e-rulemaking: an assessment of regulatory agency websites

ABSTRACT

We examine 89 websites from federal regulatory agencies in order to evaluate their ease of use for those interested in commenting on or learning about their proposed regulations. We find that while there has been a lot of attention given to second and third generation "e-rulemaking" efforts, agency websites, a first generation innovation, still have considerable room for improvement. Notwithstanding legislative and executive branch efforts to enhance the accessibility of regulatory information on the Internet, our coding of regulatory agency websites reveals considerable variation in the quality of agency websites, with many websites still failing to provide relatively basic features.

REFERENCES

• 1: Balla, Steven J. & Benjamin M. Daniels, Information Technology and Public Commenting on Agency Regulations, Regulation & Governance 1: 46--67.
• 2: Brandon, Barbara H. & Robert D. Carlitz, 2003. On-line Rulemaking and Other Tools for Strengthening Our Civic Infrastructure, Administrative Law Review 54: 1421.
• 3: Coglianese, Cary. 2004. E-Rulemaking: Information Technology and the Regulatory Process, Administrative Law Review 56: 353.
• 4: Coglianese, Cary, Stuart Shapiro, and Steven Balla. Unifying Rulemaking Information: Recommendations for the New Federal Docket Management System" Administrative Law Review 57:621 (2005).
• 5: Johnson, Stephen. M. 1998. The Internet Changes Everything: Revolutionizing Public Participation and Access to Government Information through the Internet, Administrative Law Review 50:277.
• 6: Gloria Lau , Haoyi Wang , Kincho Law , Gio Wiederhold, A relatedness analysis approach for regulation comparison and e-rulemaking applications, Proceedings of the 2005 national conference on Digital government research, May 15-18, 2005, Atlanta, Georgia
• 7: Morales, Oscar & John Moses. 2006. eRulemaking's Federal Docket Management System, available at http://erulemaking.ucsur.pitt.edu/doc/Crossroads.pdf.
• 8: Noveck, Beth. 2004. The Electronic Revolution in Rulemaking, Emory Law Review 53: 1 (2004).
• 9: Schlosberg, David, et al., 2005. 'To Submit a Form or Not to Submit a Form, That Is the (Real) Question:' Deliberation and Mass Participation in U.S. Regulatory Rulemaking, available at http://erulemaking.ucsur.pitt.edu/doc/papers/SDEST_stanford_precon.pdf.
• 10: Shane, Peter M. 2005. Turning GOLD into EPG: Lessons from Low-Tech Democratic Experimentalism for Electronic Rulemaking and Other Ventures in Cyberdemocracy, I/S: Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 1: 147.
• 11: Stuart W. Shulman , David Schlosberg , Steve Zavestoski , David Courard-Hauri, Electronic rulemaking: a public participation research agenda for the social sciences, Social Science Computer Review, v.21 n.2, p.162-178, June 2003 [doi>10.1177/0894439303251557]
• 12: Shulman, Stuart. 2004. The Internet Still Might (But Probably Won't) Change Everything, available at: http://erulemaking.ucsur.pitt.edu/doc/reports/erulemaking_final.pdf.
• 13: Stowers, Genie. "The State of Federal Websites," Price Waterhouse Coopers Endowment for the Business of Government (2002).
• 14: West, Darrell. Digital Government (Princeton University Press 2005).

INDEX TERMS

General Terms:
Design, Legal Aspects, Management

Keywords:
e-rulemaking, regulation, websites