ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Approximation algorithms for multiprocessor scheduling under uncertainty
Full text PdfPdf (302 KB)
Source ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: Scheduling table of contents
Pages: 25 - 34  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-667-7
Authors
Guolong Lin  Akamai Technologies, Cambridge, MA
Rajmohan Rajaraman  Northeastern University, Boston, MA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 97,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1248377.1248383
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Motivated by applications in grid computing and project management, we study multiprocessor scheduling in scenarios where there is uncertainty in the successful execution of jobs when assigned to processors. We consider the problem of multiprocessor scheduling under uncertainty, in which we are given n unit-time jobs and m machines, a directed acyclic graph C giving the dependencies among the jobs, and for every job j and machine i, the probability pij of the successful completion of job j when scheduled on machine i in any given particular step. The goal of the problem is to find a schedule that minimizes the expected makespan, that is, the expected completion time of all the jobs.

The problem of multiprocessor scheduling under uncertainty was introduced by Malewicz and was shown to be NP-hard even when all the jobs are independent. In this paper, we present polynomial-time approximation algorithms for the problem, for special cases of the dag C. We obtain an O(log n)-approximation for the case of independent jobs, an O(log m log n log(n + m)/ log log(n + m))-approximation when C is a collection of disjoint chains, an O(log m log2 n)-approximation when C is a collection of directed out- or in-trees, and an O(log m log2 n log(n + m)/ log log(n + m))-approximation when C is a directed forest.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
D. Applegate and B. Cook. A computational study of the job-shop scheduling problem. ORSA Journal of Computing, 3(2):149--156, 1991.
 
2
 
3
H. Chernoff. A measure of the asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23:493--509, 1952.
 
4
 
5
 
6
A. Fernandez, R. Armacost, and J. Pet-Edwards. A model for the resource constrained project scheduling problem with stochastic task durations. In 7th Industrial Engineering Research Conference Proceedings, 1998.
 
7
A. Fernandez, R. Armacost, and J. Pet-Edwards. Understanding simulation solutions to resource constrained project scheduling problems with stochastic task durations. Engineering Management Journal, 10(4):5--13, 1998.
 
8
L. R. Ford, Jr. and D. R. Fulkerson. Flows in Networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1962.
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
R. L. Graham. Bounds for certain multiprocessing anomalies. Bell System Technical Journal (BSTJ), 45:1563--1581, 1966.
 
13
 
14
W. Herroelen and R. Leus. Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(2):289--306, 2005.
 
15
W. Hoeffding. On the distribution of the number of successes in independent trials. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27:713--721, 1956.
 
16
 
17
V. Kumar, M. Marathe, S. Parthasarathy, and A. Srinivasan. Scheduling on unrelated machines under tree-like precedence constraints. In International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization, 2005.
 
18
E. L. Lawler, J. K. Lenstra, A. R. Kan, and D. B. Shmoys. Sequencing and scheduling: Algorithms and complexity. Technical Report BS-R8909, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science., Amsterdam, 1991.
 
19
F. T. Leighton, B. M. Maggs, and S. Rao. Packet routing and job-shop scheduling in O (congestion + dilation) steps. Combinatorica, 14(2):167--186, 1994.
 
20
 
21
G. Lin and R. Rajaraman. Approximation algorithms for multiprocessor scheduling under uncertainty. Technical report, arXiv, March 2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0703100.
22
 
23
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
29
 
30


Collaborative Colleagues:
Guolong Lin: colleagues
Rajmohan Rajaraman: colleagues