ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Quality is in the eye of the beholder: towards user-centric web-databases
Full text PdfPdf (359 KB)
Source
International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data table of contents
Beijing, China
SESSION: Group 2 table of contents
Pages: 1106 - 1108  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-686-8
Authors
Huiming Qu  University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Jie Xu  University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Alexandros Labrinidis  University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 57,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1247480.1247622
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The proliferation of database-driven web sites (or web-databases) has brought upon a plethora of applications where both Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Data (QoD) are of paramount importance to the end users. In our previous work, we have proposed Quality Contracts, a comprehensive framework for specifying multiple dimensions of QoS/QoD; we have also developed user-centric admission control and scheduling algorithms in web databases, whose goal is to maximize overall system performance. In this work, we turn our attention to the user side of the equation. Specifically, we propose to demonstrate how the adaptation of Quality Contracts (QCs) by the users can lead to vastly different performance results, both from the user point of view (i.e., user satisfaction) and also from the system point of view. Towards this, we propose to structure our demo in the form of an interactive game, where participants will be playing the role of users continuously adapting their QCs over time, while "playing" against system-generated users, who follow predetermined QC adaptation policies. Finally, we also propose to illustrate the effect of different admission control and scheduling policies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. AuYoung, L. Grit, J.Wiener, and J. Wilkes. Service contracts and aggregate utility functions. In HPDC, 2006.
 
2
R. Buyya, D. Abramson, and S. Venugopal. The Grid Economy. Proceedings of the IEEE, 93(3):698--714, 2005.
 
3
B. T. Dai, N. Koudas, B. C. Ooi, D. Srivastava, and S. Venkatasubramanian. Column heterogeneity as a measure of data quality. In First Intl. VLDB Workshop on Clean Databases, 2006.
 
4
A. Labrinidis, H. Qu, and J. Xu. Quality contracts for real-time enterprises. In Proc. of First Intl. Workshop on Business Intelligence for the Real Time Enterprise (BIRTE), 2006.
 
5
H. Qu and A. Labrinidis. Preference-aware query and update scheduling in web-databases. In ICDE, 2007.
 
6
H. Qu, A. Labrinidis, and D. Mosse. Unit: User-centric transaction management in web-database systems. In ICDE, 2006.
 
7
 
8
J. Xu and A. Labrinidis. Replication-aware query processing in large-scale distributed information systems. In WebDB, 2006.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Huiming Qu: colleagues
Jie Xu: colleagues
Alexandros Labrinidis: colleagues