| Quality is in the eye of the beholder: towards user-centric web-databases |
| Full text |
Pdf
(359 KB)
|
Source
|
International Conference on Management of Data
archive
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
table of contents
Beijing, China
SESSION: Group 2
table of contents
Pages: 1106 - 1108
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-686-8
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 57, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The proliferation of database-driven web sites (or web-databases) has brought upon a plethora of applications where both Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Data (QoD) are of paramount importance to the end users. In our previous work, we have proposed Quality Contracts, a comprehensive framework for specifying multiple dimensions of QoS/QoD; we have also developed user-centric admission control and scheduling algorithms in web databases, whose goal is to maximize overall system performance. In this work, we turn our attention to the user side of the equation. Specifically, we propose to demonstrate how the adaptation of Quality Contracts (QCs) by the users can lead to vastly different performance results, both from the user point of view (i.e., user satisfaction) and also from the system point of view. Towards this, we propose to structure our demo in the form of an interactive game, where participants will be playing the role of users continuously adapting their QCs over time, while "playing" against system-generated users, who follow predetermined QC adaptation policies. Finally, we also propose to illustrate the effect of different admission control and scheduling policies.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
A. AuYoung, L. Grit, J.Wiener, and J. Wilkes. Service contracts and aggregate utility functions. In HPDC, 2006.
|
| |
2
|
R. Buyya, D. Abramson, and S. Venugopal. The Grid Economy. Proceedings of the IEEE, 93(3):698--714, 2005.
|
| |
3
|
B. T. Dai, N. Koudas, B. C. Ooi, D. Srivastava, and S. Venkatasubramanian. Column heterogeneity as a measure of data quality. In First Intl. VLDB Workshop on Clean Databases, 2006.
|
| |
4
|
A. Labrinidis, H. Qu, and J. Xu. Quality contracts for real-time enterprises. In Proc. of First Intl. Workshop on Business Intelligence for the Real Time Enterprise (BIRTE), 2006.
|
| |
5
|
H. Qu and A. Labrinidis. Preference-aware query and update scheduling in web-databases. In ICDE, 2007.
|
| |
6
|
H. Qu, A. Labrinidis, and D. Mosse. Unit: User-centric transaction management in web-database systems. In ICDE, 2006.
|
| |
7
|
Michael Stonebraker , Paul M. Aoki , Witold Litwin , Avi Pfeffer , Adam Sah , Jeff Sidell , Carl Staelin , Andrew Yu, Mariposa: a wide-area distributed database system, The VLDB Journal — The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, v.5 n.1, p.048-063, January 1996
[doi> 10.1007/s007780050015]
|
| |
8
|
J. Xu and A. Labrinidis. Replication-aware query processing in large-scale distributed information systems. In WebDB, 2006.
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.3
INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
H.3.5
On-line Information Services
Subjects:
Web-based services
Additional Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.2
DATABASE MANAGEMENT
H.2.4
Systems
Subjects:
Transaction processing;
Query processing
H.3
INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
H.3.4
Systems and Software
Subjects:
Performance evaluation (efficiency and effectiveness);
User profiles and alert services
General Terms:
Algorithms,
Design,
Economics,
Experimentation,
Human Factors,
Performance
Keywords:
quality contracts,
quality of data,
quality of service,
query processing,
transaction processing,
user-centric,
web-databases
|