| In-network execution of monitoring queries in sensor networks |
| Full text |
Pdf
(489 KB)
|
Source
|
International Conference on Management of Data
archive
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
table of contents
Beijing, China
SESSION: Distributed data management
table of contents
Pages: 521 - 532
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-686-8
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25, Downloads (12 Months): 134, Citation Count: 5
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Sensor networks are widely used in many applications for collecting information from the physical environment. In these applications, it is usually necessary to track the relationships between sensor data readings within a time window to detect events of interest. However, it is difficult to detect such events by using the common aggregate or selection queries. We address the problem of processing window self-join in order to detect events of interest. Self-joins are useful in tracking correlations between different sensor readings, which can indicate an event of interest. We propose the Two-Phase Self-Join (TPSJ) scheme to efficiently evaluate self-join queries for event detection in sensor networks. Our TPSJ scheme takes advantage of the properties of the events and carries out data filtering during in-network processing. We discuss TPSJ execution with one window and we extend it for continuous event monitoring. Our experimental evaluation results indicate that the TPSJ scheme is effective in reducing the amount of radio transmissions during event detection.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
D. J. Abadi, S. Madden, and W. Lindner. Reed: Robust, efficient filtering and event detection in sensor networks. In VLDB, 2005.
|
| |
2
|
B. Babcock, S. Babu, M. Datar, R. Motwani, and J. Widom. Models and issues in data stream systems. In PODS, 2002.
|
| |
3
|
S. Babu, J. W. Kamesh Munagala, and R. Motwani. Adaptive caching for continuous queries. In ICDE, 2005.
|
| |
4
|
V. Chowdhary and H. Gupta. Communication-efficient implementation of join in sensor networks. In DASFAA, 2005.
|
| |
5
|
J. Considine, F. Li, G. Kollios, and J. Byers. Approximate aggregation techniques for sensor databases. In ICDE, 2004.
|
| |
6
|
A. Deligiannakis, Y. Kotidis, and N. Roussopoulos. Hierarchical in-network data aggregation with quality guarantees. In EDBT, 2004.
|
| |
7
|
A. Deshpande, C. Guestrin, S. Madden, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Model-driven data acquisition in sensor networks. In VLDB, 2004.
|
| |
8
|
L. Golab and M. T. Özsu. Processing sliding window multi-joins in continuous queries over data streams. In VLDB, 2003.
|
| |
9
|
M. A. Hammad, W. G. Aref, and A. K. Elmagarmid. Stream join: Tracking moving objects in sensor-network databases. In SSDBM, 2003.
|
| |
10
|
I. Lazaridis and S. Mehrotra. Capturing sensor-generated time series with quality guarantees. In ICDE, 2003.
|
| |
11
|
Q. Li and D. Rus. Global clock synchronization in sensor networks. In INFOCOM, 2004.
|
| |
12
|
S. Madden, M. Franklin, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Tinydb: An acquisitional query processing system for sensor networks. In TODS, 2005.
|
| |
13
|
S. R. Madden, M. A. Shah, J. M. Hellerstein, and V. Raman. Continuously adaptive continuous queries over streams. In SIGMOD, 2002.
|
| |
14
|
U. Srivastava, K. Munagala, and J. Widom. Operator placement for in-network stream query processing. In PODS, 2005.
|
| |
15
|
S. Xiang, H. Lim, K. L. Tan, and Y. Zhou. Two-tier multiple query optimization for sensor networks. In ICDCS, 2007.
|
| |
16
|
Y. Yao and J. Gehrke. Query processing for sensor networks. In CIDR, 2003.
|
|