ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Traversing a set of points with a minimum number of turns
Full text PdfPdf (274 KB)
Source
Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the twenty-third annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Gyeongju, South Korea
SESSION: Session 1B table of contents
Pages: 46 - 55  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-705-6
Authors
Sergey Bereg  University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX
Prosenjit Bose  Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Adrian Dumitrescu  University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI
Ferran Hurtado  Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Pavel Valtr  Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 55,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1247069.1247077
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Given a finite set of points S in Rd, consider visiting thepoints in S with a polygonal path that makes a minimum number ofturns, or equivalently, has the the minimum number of segments(links). We call this minimization problem the minimum linkspanning path problem. This natural problem has appeared severaltimes in the literature under different variants. The simplest oneis where the allowed paths are axis-aligned. Let L(S) be theminimum number of links of an axis-aligned path for S denote by Gdn the d-dimensional grid of size n. Kranakis, Krizanc andMeertens (Ars Combinatoria, vol. 38, pp. 177--192, 1994)showed that in 2-dimensions L(G2n)=2n-1 and in three dimensions 4/3 n2-O(n)< L(G3n) < 3/2 n2+O(n). Kranakiset al. conjectured that, for all d ≥ 3, L(Gdn)= d/d-1 nd-1 ± O(nd-2). We prove theconjecture for d=3 by showing that L(G3n) ≥ 3/2 n2 -O(n). For d=4, we prove that 4/3 n3 -O(n2) ≤ L(G4n) ≤ 4/3 n3 +O(n5/2).For general d, we give new estimates on L(Gdn), that bring usvery close to the conjectured value. The new lower bound of (1+ 1/d)nd-1-O(nd-2) improves previous result byCollins and Moret (Information Processing Letters, vol. 68,pp. 317--319, 1998), while the new upper bound of (1+ 1/d-1)nd-1+O(nd-3/2) differs from the conjecturedvalue only in the lower order terms. For arbitrary point sets, we give an exact bound on the minimumnumber of links needed in an axis-aligned path traversing any planar n-point set. We obtain similar tight estimates (within 1) in anynumber of dimensions d. For the general problem of traversing anarbitrary set of points in Rd with an axis-aligned spanning pathhaving a minimum number of links, we present a constant ratio(depending on the dimension d) approximation algorithm.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
P. Bras , W. Moser, and J. Pach, Research Problems in Discrete Geometry, Springer, New York, 2005.
 
4
 
5
M. J. Collins, Covering a set of points with a minimum number of turns, International Journal of Computational Geometry & Applications, 14(1--2) (2004), 105--114.
 
6
 
7
F. Gavril, Some NP-complete problems on graphs, Proc. 11th Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, 1977, 91--95.
 
8
 
9
E. Kranakis, D. Krizanc and L. Meertens, Link length of rectilinear Hamiltonian tours in grids, Ars Combinatoria, 38 (1994), 177--192.
 
10
A. Maheshwari, J-R. Sack and H.N. Djidjev, Link distance problems, in Handbook of Computational Geometry (J-R. Sack and J. Urrutia, eds.), chap12, Elsevier, 2000, pp519--558.
 
11
N. Megiddo and A. Tamir, On the complexity of locating linear facilities in the plane, Operations Research Letters, 1(5) (1982), 194--197.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sergey Bereg: colleagues
Prosenjit Bose: colleagues
Adrian Dumitrescu: colleagues
Ferran Hurtado: colleagues
Pavel Valtr: colleagues