ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Fighting pollution dissemination in peer-to-peer networks
Full text PdfPdf (211 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Seoul, Korea
SESSION: Trust, recommendations, evidence and other collaboration know-how (TRECK'07) table of contents
Pages: 1586 - 1590  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-59593-480-4
Authors
Cristiano Costa  Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Vanessa Soares  Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Jussara Almeida  Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Virgilio Almeida  Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 118,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1244002.1244340
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Recent studies reported a new form of malicious behavior in popular file-sharing Peer-to-Peer (P2P) systems, namely, content pollution, which reduces content availability, decreasing the confidence of users in such systems. This paper proposes Scrubber, a new descentralized peer reputation system that imposes severe and quick punishment to content polluters but also promotes peer rehabilitation. We evaluate the efficiency of Scrubber in reducing pollution dissemination via simulation, comparing it against the previously proposed Credence object reputation system as well as a system without reputation. Two pollution mechanisms, namely, decoy insertion and identifier corruption, are considered. Our results show that, for various scenarios, Scrubber is able to quickly reduce the fraction of daily downloads to polluted content to a small percentage. If compared to Credence, Scrubber has a much better convergence and competitive maximum efficiency, unless the fraction of peers that delete their polluted content in response to punishment (i.e., download request refusals) is very small (under 25%). In this case, Credence achieves a slightly higher efficiency in the long run.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
E. Adar and B. A. Huberman. Free Riding on Gnutella. First Monday, Sep. 2000.
 
2
3
4
5
6
7
 
8
J. Liang, R. Kumar, Y. Xi, and K. W. Ross. Pollution in P2P File Sharing Systems. In Proc. IEEE Infocom, Miami, FL, Mar. 2005.
 
9
J. Liang, N. Naoumov, and K. Ross. Efficient Blacklisting and Pollution-Level Estimation in P2P File-Sharing Systems. In Proc. AINTEC, Bangkok, Thailand, Dec. 2005.
 
10
J. Liang, N. Naoumov, and K. Ross. The Index Poisoning Attack in P2P File-Sharing Systems. In Proc. IEEE Infocom, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006.
 
11
J. Pouwelse, P. Garbacki, D. Epema, and H. Sips. The BitTorrent P2P File-sharing System: Measurements and Analysis. In Proc. IPTPS, Ithaca, NY, Feb. 2005.
 
12
 
13
S. Saroiu, P. Gummadi, and S. Gribble. A Measurement Study of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Systems. In Proc. MMCN, San Jose, CA, Jan. 2002.
 
14
R. Thommes and M. Coates. Epidemiological Modelling of Peer-to-Peer Viruses and Pollution. In Proc. IEEE Infocom, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006.
15


Collaborative Colleagues:
Cristiano Costa: colleagues
Vanessa Soares: colleagues
Jussara Almeida: colleagues
Virgilio Almeida: colleagues