ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A solver for quantified Boolean and linear constraints
Full text PdfPdf (191 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Seoul, Korea
SESSION: Constraint solving and programming table of contents
Pages: 321 - 325  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-59593-480-4
Authors
Lucas Bordeaux  Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Lintao Zhang  Microsoft Research, Silicon Valley, Mountain View, California
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1244002.1244078
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We make a number of contributions to the understanding and practical resolution of quantified constraints. Unlike previous work in the CP literature that was essentially focused on constraints expressed as binary tables, we focus on Presburger Arithmetics, i.e., Boolean combinations of linear constraints. From a theoretical perspective, we clarify the problem of the treatment of universal quantifiers by proposing a "symmetric" version of the notion of quantified consistency. This notion imposes to maintain two constraint stores, which will be used to reason on universal and existential variables, respectively. We then describe a branch & bound algorithm that integrates both forms of propagation. Its implementation is, to the best of our knowledge, the first CP solver for this class of quantified constraints.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. Ansótegui, C. P. Gomes, and B. Selman. The Achilles' heel of QBF. In AAAI, pages 275--281, 2005.
 
2
L. Bordeaux, M. Cadoli, and T. Mancini. CSP properties for quantified constraints: Definitions and complexity. In AAAI, pages 360--365, 2005.
 
3
 
4
K. N. Brown, J. Little, P. J. Creed, and E. C. Freuder. Adversarial constraint satisfaction by game-tree search. In ECAI, pages 151--155, 2004.
 
5
H. Chen. Quantified constraint satisfaction and bounded treewidth. In ECAI, pages 161--165, 2004.
 
6
H. Chen and M. Pál. Optimization, games, and quantified constraint satisfaction. In MFCS, pages 239--250, 2004.
 
7
I. P. Gent, P. Nightingale, and K. Stergiou. QCSP-Solve: A solver for quantified constraint satisfaction problems. In IJCAI, pages 138--143, 2005.
 
8
S. Manandhar, A. Tarim, and T. Walsh. Scenario-based stochastic constraint programming. In IJCAI, pages 257--262, 2003.
 
9
P. Nightingale. Consistency for quantified constraint satisfaction problems. In CP Workshop on Quantification in Constraint Programming, 2005.
 
10
C. Otwell, A. Remshagen, and K. Truemper. An effective QBF solver for planning problems. In AMCS, pages 311--316, 2004.
 
11
K. Stergiou. Repair methods for quantified CSPs. In CP, pages 652--666, 2005.
 
12
N. Yorke-Smith and C. Gervet. Certainty closure: a framework for reliable constraint reasoning with uncertainty. In CP, pages 769--783, 2003.
 
13
L. Zhang. Solving QBF by combining conjunctive and disjunctive normal forms. In AAAI, 2006. To appear.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Lucas Bordeaux: colleagues
Lintao Zhang: colleagues