ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A framework for prioritized reasoning based on the choice evaluation
Full text PdfPdf (266 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Seoul, Korea
SESSION: Artificial intelligence, computational logic, and image analysis table of contents
Pages: 65 - 70  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-59593-480-4
Authors
Luciano Caroprese  DEIS - Università della, Calabria, Rende, Italy
Irina Trubitsyna  DEIS - Università della, Calabria, Rende, Italy
Ester Zumpano  DEIS - Università della, Calabria, Rende, Italy
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1244002.1244017
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This work addresses the issue of prioritized reasoning in the context of logic programming. The case of preference conditions involving atoms is considered and a refinement of the comparison method of the Answer Set Optimization semantics [4] is presented. The paper introduces the concept of choice, as a set of preference rules describing common choice options in different contexts. Thus, intuitively, in the proposed approach the preference rules are not evaluated separately; but the subset of rules, related to the same choice are individuated and the choice instead of rule satisfaction is considered. The role of constraints in the feasibility of choice options is then investigated and an alternative semantics, evaluating choices on the basis of their really possible (allowed) options, is developed. Complexity analysis is also performed showing that the introduction of choices does not increase the complexity of computing preferred stable models.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Brewka, G., Well-Founded Semantics for Extended Logic Programs with Dynamic Preferences. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning, 4: 19-36, 1996.
 
2
 
3
 
4
Brewka, G., Niemela, I., Truszczynski, M., Answer Set Optimization. IJCAI, 867-872, 2003.
 
5
Brewka, G., Complex Preferences for Answer Set Optimization, KR, 213-223, 2004.
 
6
Delgrande, J., P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., Logic Programs with Compiled Preferences. ECAI, 464-468, 2000.
 
7
8
 
9
Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V., The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming, ICLP, 1070--1080, 1988.
 
10
Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V., Classical Negation in Logic Programs and Disjunctive Databases, New Generation Computing, 9:365-385, 1991.
 
11
 
12
Papadimitriou, C. H., Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, 1994.
 
13
 
14
Schaub, T., Wang, K., A Comparative Study of Logic Programs with Preference. IJCAI, 597-602, 2001.
 
15
 
16
Van Nieuwenborgh, D., Heymans, S., Vermeir, D., On Programs with Linearly Ordered Multiple Preferences. ICLP, 180-194, 2004.
 
17
Wakaki, T., Inoue, K., Sakama, C., Nitta, K., Computing Preferred Answer Sets in Answer Set Programming. LPAR, 259-273, 2003.
 
18
 
19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Luciano Caroprese: colleagues
Irina Trubitsyna: colleagues
Ester Zumpano: colleagues