ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Measuring semantic similarity between words using web search engines
Full text PdfPdf (291 KB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Banff, Alberta, Canada
SESSION: Similarity and extraction table of contents
Pages: 757 - 766  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-654-7
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 46,   Downloads (12 Months): 356,   Citation Count: 18
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1242572.1242675
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
 
4
[4] D. Bollegala, Y. Matsuo, and M. Ishizuka. Disambiguating personal names on the web using automatically extracted key phrases. In Proc. of the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 553-557, 2006.
 
5
[5] C. Buckley, G. Salton, J. Allan, and A. Singhal. Automatic query expansion using smart: Trec 3. In Proc. of 3rd Text REtreival Conference, pages 69-80, 1994.
 
6
7
 
8
9
 
10
[10] M. Fleischman and E. Hovy. Multi-document person name resolution. In Proceedings of 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Reference Resolution Workshop, 2004.
11
 
12
 
13
[13] J. Jiang and D. Conrath. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proc. of the International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics ROCLING X, 1998.
 
14
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
19
 
20
[20] Y. Matsuo, T. Sakaki, K. Uchiyama, and M. Ishizuka. Graph-based word clustering using web search engine. In Proc. of EMNLP 2006, 2006.
 
21
 
22
[22] D. Medin, R. Goldstone, and D. Gentner. Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 6(1):1-28, 1991.
 
23
[23] P. Mika. Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. In Proc. of ISWC2005, 2005.
 
24
[24] G. Miller and W. Charles. Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(1):1-28, 1998.
25
 
26
[26] J. Mori, Y. Matsuo, and M. Ishizuka. Extracting keyphrases to represent relations in social networks from web. In Proc. of 20th IJCAI, 2007.
 
27
[27] M. Pasca, D. Lin, J. Bigham, A. Lifchits, and A. Jain. Organizing and searching the world wide web of facts - step one: the one-million fact extraction challenge. In Proc. of AAAI-2006, 2006.
 
28
 
29
[29] J. Platt. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparison to regularized likelihood methods. Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pages 61-74, 2000.
 
30
[30] R. Rada, H. Mili, E. Bichnell, and M. Blettner. Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 9(1):17-30, 1989.
 
31
[31] P. Resnik. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In Proc. of 14th International Joint Conference on Aritificial Intelligence, 1995.
 
32
[32] P. Resnik. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Aritificial Intelligence Research, 11:95-130, 1999.
 
33
 
34
[34] R. Rosenfield. A maximum entropy approach to adaptive statistical modelling. Computer Speech and Language, 10:187-228, 1996.
35
36
 
37
 
38
 
39
[39] A. Tversky. Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84(4):327-352, 1997.
40
 
41
[41] D. M. Y. Li, Zuhair A. Bandar. An approch for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15(4):871-882, 2003.

CITED BY  18