ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Optimizing web search using social annotations
Full text PdfPdf (369 KB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Banff, Alberta, Canada
SESSION: Search quality and precision table of contents
Pages: 501 - 510  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-654-7
Authors
Shenghua Bao  Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Guirong Xue  Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Xiaoyuan Wu  Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Yong Yu  Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Ben Fei  IBM China
Zhong Su  IBM China
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 54,   Downloads (12 Months): 521,   Citation Count: 34
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1242572.1242640
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the use of social annotations to improve websearch. Nowadays, many services, e.g. del.icio.us, have been developed for web users to organize and share their favorite webpages on line by using social annotations. We observe that the social annotations can benefit web search in two aspects: 1) the annotations are usually good summaries of corresponding webpages; 2) the count of annotations indicates the popularity of webpages. Two novel algorithms are proposed to incorporate the above information into page ranking: 1) SocialSimRank (SSR)calculates the similarity between social annotations and webqueries; 2) SocialPageRank (SPR) captures the popularity of webpages. Preliminary experimental results show that SSR can find the latent semantic association between queries and annotations, while SPR successfully measures the quality (popularity) of a webpage from the web users' perspective. We further evaluate the proposed methods empirically with 50 manually constructed queries and 3000 auto-generated queries on a dataset crawledfrom delicious. Experiments show that both SSR and SPRbenefit web search significantly.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Hotho, R. Jaschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking. In: Proc. of ESWC 2006, pp. 411--426, 2006.
 
2
A. Mathes. Folksonomies -- Cooperative Classification and Communication through Shared Metadata. http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediatedcommunication/folksonomies.html, December 2004.
3
 
4
Delicious: http://del.icio.us
5
 
6
E. Quintarelli. Folksonomies: power to the people. Paper presented at the ISKO Italy-UniMIB meeting. http://www.iskoi.org/doc/folksonomies.htm, June 2005.
7
 
8
G. Golub, C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
9
10
 
11
 
12
G. Smith. Atomiq: Folksonomy: social classification. http://atomiq.org/archives/2004/08/folksonomy_social_classification.html, Aug 3, 2004.
 
13
 
14
 
15
16
 
17
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998.
18
19
 
20
21
 
22
O. Dekel, C. Manning, and Y. Singer. Log-linear models for label-ranking. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
23
 
24
P. Merholz. Metadata for the Masses. October 19, 2004. http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000361.php
 
25
P. Mika Ontologies are us: a unified model of social networks and semantics. In: Proc. of ISWC 2005. pp. 522--536, Nov. 2005.
 
26
R. Herbrich, T. Graepel, and K. Obermayer. Support vector learning for ordinal regression. In: Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, pp. 97--102. 1999.
 
27
 
28
 
29
S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, A. Gull, M. Lau. Okapi at TREC. In:Text REtrieval Conference, pp. 21--30, 1992.
 
30
T. Hammond, T. Hannay, B. Lund, and J. Scott. Social book marking tools (i) - a general review. D-Lib Magazine, 11(4), 2005.
 
31
32
 
33
T. V. Wal. Explaining and showing broad and narrow folksonomies. http://www.personalinfocloud.com/2005/02/ explaining_and_.html : February 21, 2005.
 
34
T. Westerveld., W. Kraaij., and D. Hiemstra, Retrieving Web Pages using Content, Links, URLs and Anchors, in: Proc. of TREC10, 2002.
 
35
WordNet: http://wordnet.princeton.edu/
36
37

CITED BY  36

Collaborative Colleagues:
Shenghua Bao: colleagues
Guirong Xue: colleagues
Xiaoyuan Wu: colleagues
Yong Yu: colleagues
Ben Fei: colleagues
Zhong Su: colleagues