ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Navigationaided retrieval
Full text PdfPdf (307 KB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Banff, Alberta, Canada
SESSION: Search potpourri table of contents
Pages: 391 - 400  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-654-7
Authors
Shashank Pandit  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Christopher Olston  Yahoo! Research, Santa Clara, CA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 63,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1242572.1242626
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Users searching for information in hypermedia environments often perform querying followed by manual navigation. Yet, the conventional text/hypertext retrieval paradigm does not explicity take post-query navigation into account. This paper proposes a new retrieval paradigm, called navigation-aided retrieval (NAR), which treats both querying and navigation as first-class activities. In the NAR paradigm, querying is seen as a means to identify starting points for navigation, and navigation is guided based on information supplied in the query. NAR is a generalization of the conventional probabilistic information retrieval paradigm, which implicitly assumes no navigation takes place. This paper presents a formal model for navigation-aided retrieval, and reports empirical results that point to the real-world applicability of the model. The experiments were performed over a large Web corpus provided by TREC, using human judgments on a new rating scale developed for navigation-aided retrieval. In the case of ambiguous queries, the new retrieval model identifies good starting points for post-query navigation. For less ambiguous queries that need not be paired with navigation, the output closely matches that of a conventional retrieval system.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
M. J. Bates. The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques for the On-line Search Interface. Online Review, 13:407--431, 1989.
 
3
N. J. Belkin. Anomalous States of Knowledge as the Basis of Information Retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5:133--143, 1980.
 
4
5
 
6
 
7
S. Chakrabarti, B. E. Dom, D. Gibson, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, and A. Tomkins. Experiments in topic distillation. In Proc. SIGIR Workshop on Hypertext Information Retrieval on the Web, 1998.
8
9
10
 
11
 
12
N. Craswell, D. Hawking, A. McLean, T. Upstill, R. Wilkinson, and M. Wu. TREC12 web and interactive track at CSIRO, 2003.
13
14
15
 
16
J. English, M. Hearst, R. Sinha, K. Swearingen, and K. Yee. Flexible Search and Browsing using Faceted Metadata. http://bailando.sims.berkeley.edu/papers/flamenco02.pdf, Jan. 2002.
 
17
D. Hawking. Overview of the TREC-9 web track.
18
 
19
B. He and I. Ounis. Inferring query performance using pre-retrieval predictors. In Proc. Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval, 2004.
 
20
T. Joachims, D. Freitag, and T. Mitchell. WebWatcher: A tour guide for the World Wide Web. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 1997.
21
22
23
 
24
H. Lieberman. Letizia: An agent That assists Web browsing. In Proc. IJCAI, 1995.
25
 
26
D. Mladenic. Using text learning to help Web browsing. In Proc. SIGCHI, 2001.
 
27
MySQL DBMS. http://www.mysql.com/.
28
 
29
P. Pirolli and S. Card. Information Foraging. Psychological Review, 1999.
 
30
F. Qiu, Z. Liu, and J. Cho. Analysis of user web traffic with a focus on search activities. In Proc. International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB), June 2005.
 
31
S. Robertson, S. Walker, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, A. Gull, and M. Lau. Okapi at TREC. In Proc. TREC, 1992.
 
32
S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, A. Gull, and M. Lau. Okapi at TREC. In Text REtrieval Conference, 1992.
33
34
 
35
36
 
37
Apache Tomcat. http://tomcat.apache.org/.
 
38
TREC-2003 Web Track: Guidelines. http://es.csiro.au/TRECWeb/guidelines 2003.html.
 
39
40
41


Collaborative Colleagues:
Shashank Pandit: colleagues
Christopher Olston: colleagues