ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Learning information intent via observation
Full text PdfPdf (438 KB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Banff, Alberta, Canada
SESSION: Smarter browsing table of contents
Pages: 51 - 60  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-654-7
Authors
Anthony Tomasic  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Isaac Simmons  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
John Zimmerman  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 76,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1242572.1242580
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Users in an organization frequently request help by sending request messages to assistants that express information intent: an intention to update data in an information system. Human assistants spend a significant amount of time and effort processing these requests. For example, human resource assistants process requests to update personnel records, and executive assistants process requests to schedule conference rooms or to make travel reservations. To process the intent of a request, assistants read the request and then locate, complete, and submit a form that corresponds to the expressed intent. Automatically or semi-automatically processing the intent expressed in a request on behalf of an assistant would ease the mundane and repetitive nature of this kind of work.For a well-understood domain, a straightforward application of natural language processing techniques can be used to build an intelligent form interface to semi-automatically process information intent request messages. However, high performance parsers are based on machine learning algorithms that require a large corpus of examples that have been labeled by an expert. The generation of a labeled corpus of requests is a major barrier to the construction of a parser. In this paper, we investigate the construction of a natural language processing system and an intelligent form system that observes an assistant processing requests. The intelligent form system then generates a labeled training corpus by interpreting the observations. This paper reports on the measurement of the performance of the machine learning algorithms based on real data. The combination of observations, machine learning and interaction design produces an effective intelligent form interface based on natural language processing.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
William W. Cohen, Einat Minkov, Anthony Tomasic, Learning to Understand Web Site Update Requests, in Proceedings of IJCAI, 2005, pp 1028--1033.
2
 
3
Ray Mooney, Learning semantic parsers: An important but under-studied problem, in Working notes of the AAAI spring symposium on language learning, 2004.
 
4
Anthony Tomasic, William Cohen, Susan Fussell, John Zimmerman, Marina Kobayashi, Einat Minkov, Nathan Halstead, Ravi Mosur, and Jason Hum, Learning to Navigate Web Forms, in Workshop on Information Integration on the Web (IIWEB), 2004.
5
 
6
William W. Cohen, Minorthird: Methods for Identifying Names and Ontological Relations in Text using Heuristics for Inducing Regularities from Data, http://minorthird.sourceforge.net.
7
8
9
 
10
Oren Etzioni, Alon Halevy, Henry Levy, and Luke McDowell, Semantic Email: Adding Lightweight Data Manipulation Capabilities to the Email Habitat. International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB), June 12-13, 2003, San Diego, California.
 
11
Alon Halevy, Oren Etzioni, AnHai Doan, Zachary Ives, Jayant Madhavan, Luke McDowell, Igor Tatarinov, Crossing the Structure Chasm in Conference on Innovated Data Systems Research (CIDR), 2003.
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
William W. Cohen, Pradeep Ravikumar, Stephen Fienberg, A Comparison of String Distance Metrics for Name-Matching Tasks in Workshop on Information Integration on the Web (IIWEB), 2003.
 
16
Terry Winograd, Understanding Natural Language, Ph.D. thesis, Academic Press, 1972.
 
17
Rohit J. Kate, Yuk Wah Wong, Raymond J. Mooney, Learning to Transform Natural to Formal Languages. Proceedings of AAAI, 2005.
 
18
Einat Minkov, Richard C. Wang, Anthony Tomasic, William W. Cohen, NER Systems that Suit User's Preferences: Adjusting the Recall-Precision Trade-off for Entity Extraction in HLT/NAACL, 2006.
 
19
SecondString. http://secondstring.sourceforge.net/
 
20
21
 
22
W. Cohen, V. Carvalho, and T. Mitchell, Learning to classify email into "speech acts", in Conference Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2004.
23
24
 
25
Ivan Felligi, Alan Sunter, "A theory for record linkage", Journal of the American Statistical Society, 64:1183--1210, 1969.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Anthony Tomasic: colleagues
Isaac Simmons: colleagues
John Zimmerman: colleagues