|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
Out-of-order execution significantly increases the performanceof superscalar processors. The out-of-order execution mechanismis, however, energy-inefficient, which inhibits scaling superscalar processorsto high issue widths and large instruction windows. In this paper, we build on the observation that between 19% and 36% of the instructions are immediately ready for execution, even before entering the issue queue. Yet, these instructions proceed to the energy-consuming steps ofinstruction wake-up and select and they needlessly occupy space in theissue queue. To save energy, we propose for these instructions to by-pass the out-of-order execution core. Instead, we execute them on an energy-efficient single-issue in-order by-pass pipeline.The by-pass pipeline executes a significant fraction of all instructions,allowing performance-energy trade-offs with respect to the issue width of the out-of-order pipeline and to the issue queue size.By making these trade-offs, we show energy reductions of 53% for the issue queue, 33% for the register file and 31% in the write-back and wake-up logic. Performance remains almost unaffected. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
Collaborative Colleagues:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||