Multiple mice for retention tasks in disadvantaged schools

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates single-mouse and multiple-mice configurations for computer-aided learning in schools where access to computers is limited due to resource constraints. Multimouse, a single display groupware solution, developed to allow multiple mice to be used simultaneously on a single PC, is compared with single-user-single-mouse and multiple-user-single-mouse scenarios. Multimouse itself is trialed with two unique interaction designs -- one where competitive interaction among students is encouraged, and another where more collaborative interaction is expected. Experiments were conducted with 238 schoolchildren from underprivileged households in rural India on an English vocabulary retention task. On the whole, Multimouse configurations (five users each) were found to be at par with single-user scenarios in terms of actual words learned by students. This suggests that the value of a PC can be inexpensively multiplied by employing a multi-input shared-use design. Gender effects were found, where boys show significant differences in learning depending on interaction modality, whereas girls learned at similar rates across configurations. In addition, a comparison of the two Multimouse modes -- collaborative and competitive -- showed the striking difference in learning outcomes and user behavior that is possible due to even slight variations in interaction designs for multiple-mice.

REFERENCES

• 1: Abnett, C., Stanton, D., Neale, H and O'Malley. The effect of multiple input devices on collaboration and gender issues. Proc. EuroCSCL (2001), 29--36.
• 2: Steve Benford , Benjamin B. Bederson , Karl-Petter Åkesson , Victor Bayon , Allison Druin , Pär Hansson , Juan Pablo Hourcade , Rob Ingram , Helen Neale , Claire O'Malley , Kristian T. Simsarian , Danaë Stanton , Yngve Sundblad , Gustav Taxén, Designing storytelling technologies to encouraging collaboration between young children, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.556-563, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/332040.332502]
• 3: Eric A. Bier , Steven Freeman, MMM: a user interface architecture for shared editors on a single screen, Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.79-86, November 11-13, 1991, Hilton Head, South Carolina, United States [doi>10.1145/120782.120791]
• 4: Bloom B.S. and David R.K., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I. Longmans, Green (1956), NY.
• 5: Lauren J. Bricker , Steven L. Tanimoto , Edward Lasowska, Cooperatively controlled objects in support of collaboration, University of Washington, 1998
• 6: Lauren J. Bricker , Steven L. Tanimoto , Alex I. Rothenberg , Danny C. Hutama , Tina H. Wong, Multiplayer activities that develop mathematical coordination, The first international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning, p.32-39, October 1995, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Indiana, United States
• 7: Druin, A., Revelle, G., Bederson, B. B., Hourcade, J. P., Farber, A., Lee, J., & Campbell, D. A Collaborative Digital Library for Children: A Descriptive Study of Children's Collaborative Behaviors. J. Computer-Assisted Learning 19, 2 (2003), 239--248.
• 8: Ebbinghaus, H. Memory: A Contributon to Experimental Psychology. Dover Publications (1964), New York, NY.
• 9: Kori Inkpen , Kellogg S. Booth , Steven D. Gribble , Maria Klawe, Give and take: children collaborating on one computer, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.258-259, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/223355.223663]
• 10: Kori Inkpen , Kellogg S. Booth , Maria Klawe , Rena Upitis, Playing together beats playing apart, especially for girls, The first international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning, p.177-181, October 1995, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Indiana, United States
• 11: Kori M. Inkpen , Wai-ling Ho-Ching , Oliver Kuederle , Stacey D. Scott , Garth B. D. Shoemaker, This is fun! we're all best friends and we're all playing: supporting children's synchronous collaboration, Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning, p.31-es, December 12-15, 1999, Palo Alto, California
• 12: Kori Inkpen , Joanna McGrenere , Kellogg S. Booth , Maria Klawe, The effect of turn-taking protocols on children's learning in mouse-driven collaborative environments, Proceedings of the conference on Graphics interface '97, p.138-145, May 1997, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
• 13: Kam, M. Notes Towards a Framework for Designing Mobile Games for Children in the Developing World to Learn English as a Second Language in Out-of-School Settings. Proc. DREAM 2006 (2006).
• 14: Mitra, S., Dangwal, R., Chatterjee, S, Jha, S., Bisht, R.S., and Kapur, P. Acquisition of computing literacy on shared public computers: Children and the 'Hole in the Wall'. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 21, 3 (2005), 407--426.
• 15: Brad A. Myers , Herb Stiel , Robert Gargiulo, Collaboration using multiple PDAs connected to a PC, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.285-294, November 14-18, 1998, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/289444.289503]
• 16: O'Leary-Kelly, A., Mortochhio, J, Frink, D. 1994. A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group Performance. Academy of Management Journal 37, 5(1994), 1285--1301.
• 17: Oppenheimer, T. The Flickering Mind. Random House Publishers (2003).
• 18: Joyojeet Pal , Udai Singh Pawar , Eric A. Brewer , Kentaro Toyama, The case for multi-user design for computer aided learning in developing regions, Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, May 23-26, 2006, Edinburgh, Scotland [doi>10.1145/1135777.1135896]
• 19: Pawar, U. S., Pal, J., and Toyama, K. Multiple mice for computers in education in developing countries. Proc. IEEE/ACM ICTD (2006), 64--71.
• 20: Elin Rønby Pedersen , Kim McCall , Thomas P. Moran , Frank G. Halasz, Tivoli: an electronic whiteboard for informal workgroup meetings, Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.391-398, April 24-29, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/169059.169309]
• 21: Scott, S., Mandryk, R., and Inkpen, K. Understanding Children's Interactions in Synchronous Shared Environments. Proc. CSCL (2002), 333--341.
• 22: Scott, S.D., Mandryk, R.L., and Inkpen, K.M. Understanding Children's Collaborative Interactions in Shared Environments. J. CAL 19, 2 (2003), 220--228.
• 23: Chia Shen, Multi-User Interface and Interactions on Direct-Touch Horizontal Surfaces: Collaborative Tabletop Research at MERL, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems, p.53-54, January 05-07, 2006 [doi>10.1109/TABLETOP.2006.22]
• 24: Shoemaker G.B.D. Single Display Groupware research in the year 2000. TR2001-1 (2001), Simon Fraser University.
• 25: Siriginidi Subba Rao, Bridging digital divide: efforts in India, Telematics and Informatics, v.22 n.4, p.361-375, November 2005 [doi>10.1016/j.tele.2005.01.007]
• 26: Stanton D., and Neale H.R. The Effects of Multiple Mice on Children's talk and Interaction. J. Computer Assisted Learning 19, 2 (2003), 220--228.
• 27: Stanton, D., Neale, H. and Bayon, V. Interfaces to support children's co-present collaboration: multiple mice and tangible technologies. Proc. CSCL (2002), 342--352.
• 28: Jason Stewart , Benjamin B. Bederson , Allison Druin, Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.286-293, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.303064]
• 29: Jason Stewart , Elaine M. Raybourn , Ben Bederson , Allison Druin, When two hands are better than one: enhancing collaboration using single display groupware, CHI 98 conference summary on Human factors in computing systems, p.287-288, April 18-23, 1998, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/286498.286766]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation); Input devices and strategies (e.g., mouse, touchscreen)

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors

Keywords:
developing nations, education, multiple mice, shared computers, single display groupware