ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The validity of a virtual human experience for interpersonal skills education
Full text PdfPdf (1.71 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
San Jose, California, USA
SESSION: Learning & education table of contents
Pages: 1049 - 1058  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-593-9
Authors
Kyle Johnsen  University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Andrew Raij  University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Amy Stevens  University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
D. Scott Lind  Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA
Benjamin Lok  University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 130,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240784
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Any new tool introduced for education needs to be validated. We developed a virtual human experience called the Virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination (VOSCE). In the VOSCE, a medical student examines a life-size virtual human who is presenting symptoms of an illness. The student is then graded on interview skills. As part of a medical school class requirement, thirty three second year medical students participated in a user study designed to determine the validity of the VOSCE for testing interview skills. In the study, participant performance in the VOSCE is compared to participant performance in the OSCE, an interview with a trained actor. There was a significant correlation (r(33)=.49, p<.005) between overall score in the VOSCE and overall score in the OSCE. This means that the interaction skills used with a virtual human translate to the interaction skills used with a real human. Comparing the experience of virtual human interaction to real human interaction is the critical validation step towards using virtual humans for interpersonal skills education.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Alessi, N.E. and Huang, M.P., Evolution of the Virtual Human: From Term to Potential Application in Psychiatry. CyberPsychology & Behavior 3 (2000), 321--326.
2
 
3
 
4
Bordnick, P.S., Graap, K.M., Copp, H.L., Brooks, J. and Ferrer, M., Virtual Reality Cue Reactivity Assessment in Cigarette Smokers. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 8,5 (2005), 487--492.
5
 
6
Dickerson, R., Johnsen, K., Raij, A., Lok, B., Bernard, T., Stevens, A. and Lind, D.S. Virtual Patients: Assessment of Synthesized Versus Recorded Speech. In Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, (2005),114--119.
 
7
Dickerson, R., Johnsen, K., Raij, A., Lok, B., Hernandez, J., Stevens, A. and Lind, D.S. Evaluating a Script-Based Approach to Simulating Patient-Doctor Interaction. In Proceedings of SCS 2005 International Conference on Human-Computer Interface Advances for Modeling and Simulating, (2005),79--84.
 
8
Full Body Characters. www.haptek.com.
 
9
Hill, R., Gratch, J., Marsella, S., Rickel, J., Swartout, W. and Traum, D., Virtual Humans in the Mission Rehearsal Exercise System. Künstliche Intelligenz 4,03 (2003), 5--10.
 
10
 
11
 
12
Hubal, R.C., Fishbein, D.H. and Paschall, M.J. Lessons Learned using Responsive Virtual Humans for Assessing Interaction Skills. In Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference(I/ITSEC) 2004, (2004).
 
13
Hubal, R.C., Kizakevich, P.N., Guinn, C.I., Merino, K.D. and West, S.L., The Virtual Standardized Patient: Simulated Patient--Practitioner Dialog for Patient Interview Training. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 70 (2000), 133--138.
 
14
 
15
 
16
McLaughlin, K., Gregor, L., Jones, A. and Coderre, S., Can standardized patients replace physicians as OSCE examiners? BMC Medical Education 6,1 (2006), 12.
 
17
Mitchell, M. and Jolley, J. Research Design Explained. Harcourt, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
 
18
Nass, C. and Moon, Y., Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues 56 (2000), 81--103.
 
19
Dragon Naturally Speaking 8 Professional. www.nuance.com.
 
20
 
21
Park, R.S., Chibnall, J.T., Blaskiewicz, R.J., Furman, G.E., Powell, J.K. and Mohr, C.J., Contruct Validity of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Psychiatry: Associations with the Clinical Skills Examination and Other Indicators. Academic Psychiatry 28,2 (2004), 122--128.
 
22
 
23
Ponder, M., Herbelin, B., Molet, T., Scherteneib, S., Ulicny, B., Papagiannakis, G., Magnenat-Thalmann, N. and Thalmann, D. Interactive Scenario Immersion: Health Emergency Decision Training in the JUST Project,. In VRMHR 2002, (2002).
 
24
 
25
Thórisson, K.R. and Cassell, J. Why Put an Agent in a Body: The Importance of Communicative Feedback in Human-Humanoid Dialogue. In Proceedings of Lifelike Computer Characters '96, (1996),44--45.
 
26
Vinayagamoorthy, V., Steed, A. and Slater, M. Building Characters: Lessons Drawn from Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science: A CogSci 2005 Workshop, (2005),119--126.
 
27
Wind, L.A., Dalen, J.v., Muijtjens, A.M.M. and Rethans, J.-J., Assessing Simulated Patients in an Educational Setting: the MaSP (Maastricht Assessment of Simulated Patients). Medical Education 38,1 (2004), 39--44.
28


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kyle Johnsen: colleagues
Andrew Raij: colleagues
Amy Stevens: colleagues
D. Scott Lind: colleagues
Benjamin Lok: colleagues