ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
An empirical study of the use of visually enhanced voip audio conferencing: the case of IEAC
Full text PdfPdf (784 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
San Jose, California, USA
SESSION: Distributed interaction table of contents
Pages: 1019 - 1028  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-593-9
Authors
Xianghua Ding  UC Irvine, Irvine, CA
Thomas Erickson  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heighs, NY
Wendy A. Kellogg  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heighs, NY
Stephen Levy  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heighs, NY
James E. Christensen  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heighs, NY
Jeremy Sussman  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heighs, NY
Tracee Vetting Wolf  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heighs, NY
William E. Bennett  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heighs, NY
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 73,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240780
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

IBM Enhanced Audio Conferencing (IEAC) is a VoIP-based audio conferencing system that, like several other systems, provides a visualization showing who is present and their states (e.g., speaking, muted). This paper presents the first study of the use of such a system. Drawing on log files collected over six weeks of use by over 1300 corporate employees, and interviews with 10 of them, we look at how and why various features of the system are used and what sorts of practices are supported. Our findings shed light on the factors that drive the use of visual enhancements to audio conferencing, and suggest further research topics.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
Colburn, R. A., Cohen, M. F., Drucker, S. M., Tiernan, S. L. and Gupta, A. Graphical Enhancements for Voice Only Conference Calls. Microsoft Research Technical Report, MSR-TR-2001-95, October 1, 2001. http://research.microsoft.com/research/coet/Graphics/TRs/01-95.pdf. Accessed September 24, 2006.
5
6
7
 
8
Kaplan, J. and Yankelovich, N. Sun Labs Meeting Suite, Executive Edition. Available at http://research.sun.com/projects/mc/hcic-boaster.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2006.
9
 
10
LiveMeeting. http://office.microsoft.com/livemeeting/. Accessed September 26, 2006.
11
 
12
13
 
14
Olson, G.M. and Olson, J.S. Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction, 15, 2&3 (2000), 139--178.
 
15
SameTime. http://www.ibm.com/lotus/sametime Accessed September 26, 2006.
16
 
17
Sellen, A. Remote conversations: The effects of mediating talk with technology. In Human Computer Interaction, 10, 4 (1995), 401--444.
 
18
 
19
TeamSpace. http://www.teamspace.com/. Accessed September 26, 2006.
 
20
Von Hippel, E. Democratizing innovation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005.
21
22
23
24

Collaborative Colleagues:
Xianghua Ding: colleagues
Thomas Erickson: colleagues
Wendy A. Kellogg: colleagues
Stephen Levy: colleagues
James E. Christensen: colleagues
Jeremy Sussman: colleagues
Tracee Vetting Wolf: colleagues
William E. Bennett: colleagues