ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media
Full text PdfPdf (540 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
San Jose, California, USA
SESSION: Tags, tagging & notetaking table of contents
Pages: 971 - 980  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-593-9
Authors
Morgan Ames  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Mor Naaman  Yahoo! Research Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 97,   Downloads (12 Months): 705,   Citation Count: 50
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240772
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Why do people tag? Users have mostly avoided annotating media such as photos -- both in desktop and mobile environments -- despite the many potential uses for annotations, including recall and retrieval. We investigate the incentives for annotation in Flickr, a popular web-based photo-sharing system, and ZoneTag, a cameraphone photo capture and annotation tool that uploads images to Flickr. In Flickr, annotation (as textual tags) serves both personal and social purposes, increasing incentives for tagging and resulting in a relatively high number of annotations. ZoneTag, in turn, makes it easier to tag cameraphone photos that are uploaded to Flickr by allowing annotation and suggesting relevant tags immediately after capture.

A qualitative study of ZoneTag/Flickr users exposed various tagging patterns and emerging motivations for photo annotation. We offer a taxonomy of motivations for annotation in this system along two dimensions (sociality and function), and explore the various factors that people consider when tagging their photos. Our findings suggest implications for the design of digital photo organization and sharing applications, as well as other applications that incorporate user-based annotation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Flickr, http://www.flickr.com
2
 
3
Girgensohn, A., Adcock, J., Cooper, M., Foote, J. and Wilcox, L. Simplifying the Management of Large Photo Collections. In Proc. INTERACT '03. IOS Press (2003).
 
4
Golder, S., and Huberman, B.A. The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Tech. Report, HP Labs, 2005.
 
5
Kang, H., and Shneiderman, B. Exploring Personal Media: A Spatial Interface Supporting User-defined Semantic Regions. Tech. Report ISR 2005--51, U. Maryland, 2005.
 
6
7
8
 
9
Kules, B., Kang, H., Plaisant, C., Rose, A., and Shneiderman, B. Immediate Usability: Kiosk Design Principles from the CHI 2001 Photo Library. Tech. Report CS-TR-4293, U. Maryland, 2003.
 
10
Kustanowitz, J. and Shneiderman, B. Motivating Annotation for Personal Digital Photo Libraries: Lowering Barriers while Raising Incentives. Tech. Report HCIL-2004-18, U. Maryland, 2005.
11
12
 
13
Naaman, M., Paepcke, A., and Garcia-Molina, H. From Where to What: Metadata Sharing for Digital Photographs with Geographic Coordinates. In Proc. CoopIS '03, ACM Press (2003).
14
 
15
Okabe, D., and Ito, M. Everyday Contexts of Camera Phone Use: Steps Toward Technosocial Ethnographic Frameworks. In Mobile Communication in Everyday Life: An Ethnographic View, forthcoming.
 
16
Rodden, K. How do People Organise their Photographs? In BCS-IRSG Colloquium on Information Retrieval, 1999.
17
18
19
20
 
21
22
23
24
 
25
Wenyin, L., Dumais, S., Sun, Y., Zhang, H., Czerwinski, M., and Field, B. Semi-automatic image annotation. In Proc. INTERACT '01, IOS Press (July 2001).

CITED BY  50