ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Understanding and developing models for detecting and differentiating breakpoints during interactive tasks
Full text FlvFlv (28:52),  PdfPdf (538 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
San Jose, California, USA
SESSION: Tasks table of contents
Pages: 697 - 706  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-593-9
Authors
Shamsi T. Iqbal  University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
Brian P. Bailey  University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 109,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240732
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The ability to detect and differentiate breakpoints during task execution is critical for enabling defer-to-breakpoint policies within interruption management. In this work, we examine the feasibility of building statistical models that can detect and differentiate three granularities (types) of perceptually meaningful breakpoints during task execution, without having to recognize the underlying tasks. We collected ecological samples of task execution data, and asked observers to review the interaction in the collected videos and identify any perceived breakpoints and their type. Statistical methods were applied to learn models that map features of the interaction to each type of breakpoint. Results showed that the models were able to detect and differentiate breakpoints with reasonably high accuracy across tasks. Among many uses, our resulting models can enable interruption management systems to better realize defer-to-breakpoint policies for interactive, free-form tasks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Altheide, D.L. Qualitative Media Analysis. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1996.
 
3
 
4
Bailey, B.P., P.D. Adamczyk, T.Y. Chang and N.A. Chilson. A Framework for Specifying and Monitoring User Tasks. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 22 (4), 2006, 685--708.
 
5
Bailey, B.P. and J.A. Konstan. On the Need for Attention Aware Systems: Measuring Effects of Interruption on Task Performance, Error Rate, and Affective State. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, 22 (4), 2006, 709--732.
 
6
 
7
Czerwinski, M., E. Cutrell and E. Horvitz. Instant Messaging: Effects of Relevance and Timing. People and Computers XIV: Proceedings of HCI, 2000, 71--76.
8
9
10
11
12
 
13
 
14
Hanson, C. and W. Hirst. On the Representation of Events: A Study of Orientation, Recall, and Recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118 (2), 1989, 136--147.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
 
22
Nair, R., S. Voida and E. Mynatt. Frequency--Based Detection of Task Switches. Proceedings of the 19th British HCI Group Annual Conference, 2005, 94--99.
 
23
Newtson, D. Attribution and the Unit of Perception of Ongoing Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28 (1), 1973, 28--38.
 
24
Newtson, D. and G. Engquist. The Perceptual Organization of Ongoing Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 1976, 436--450.
 
25
Newtson, D., G. Enquist and J. Bois. The Objective Basis of Behavior Units. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (12), 1977, 847--862.
 
26
Rizzolatti, G., L. Fadiga, V. Gallese and L. Fogassi. Premotor Cortex and the Recognition of Motor Actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 1996, 131--141.
27
 
28
Zacks, J., B. Tversky and G. Iyer. Perceiving, Remembering, and Communicating Structure in Events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130 (1), 2001, 29--58.
 
29
Zacks, J.M. and B. Tversky. Event Structure in Perception and Conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 2001, 3--21.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Shamsi T. Iqbal: colleagues
Brian P. Bailey: colleagues