ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
IGroup: presenting web image search results in semantic clusters
Full text PdfPdf (1.08 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
San Jose, California, USA
SESSION: Web usability table of contents
Pages: 587 - 596  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-593-9
Authors
Shuo Wang  Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China
Feng Jing  Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China
Jibo He  Peking University, Beijing, China
Qixing Du  Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Lei Zhang  Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 135,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240718
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Current web image search engines still rely on user typing textual description: query word(s) for visual targets. As the queries are often short, general or even ambiguous, the images in resulting pages vary in content and style. Thus, browsing with these results is likely to be tedious, frustrating and unpredictable.

IGroup, a proposed image search engine addresses these problems by presenting the result in semantic clusters. The original result set was clustered in semantic groups with a cluster name relevant to user typed queries. Instead of looking through the result pages or modifying queries, IGroup users can refine findings to the interested sub-result sets with a navigational panel, where each cluster (sub-result set) was listed with a cluster name and representative thumbnails of the cluster.

We compared IGroup with a general web image search engine: MSN, in term of efficiency, coverage, and satisfaction with a substantial user study. Our tool shows significant improvement in such criteria.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
B. Luo, X. G. Wang, and X. O. Tang, A World Wide Web Based Image Search Engine Using Text and Image Content Features, Proc. of IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging 2003, Internet Imaging IV.
 
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
 
12
Ask.com image search. http://images.ask.com
 
13
Flickr photo search by tags. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/microsoft/clusters
 
14
Google. http://www.google.com/
 
15
Google Image Search. http://images.google.com
 
16
MSN Search. http://search.msn.com/
 
17
Picsearch. http://www.picsearch.com/
 
18
TASI image search engine review. http://www.tasi.ac.uk/resources/searchengines.html
 
19
Using images to increase your search engine rankings. http://www.thumbshots.org/article.pxf?artid=99
 
20
Wikipedia: Tag(metadata). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_%28metadata%29

CITED BY  6

Collaborative Colleagues:
Shuo Wang: colleagues
Feng Jing: colleagues
Jibo He: colleagues
Qixing Du: colleagues
Lei Zhang: colleagues