ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Momento: support for situated ubicomp experimentation
Full text PdfPdf (1.74 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
San Jose, California, USA
SESSION: Ubicomp tools table of contents
Pages: 125 - 134  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-593-9
Authors
Scott Carter  FX Palo Alto Laboratory, Inc., Palo Alto, CA
Jennifer Mankoff  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Jeffrey Heer  University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25,   Downloads (12 Months): 131,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240644
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present the iterative design of Momento, a tool that providesintegrated support for situated evaluation of ubiquitouscomputing applications. We derived requirements for Momento from a user-centered design process that includedinterviews, observations and field studies of early versionsof the tool. Motivated by our findings, Momento supportsremote testing of ubicomp applications, helps with participantadoption and retention by minimizing the need for newhardware, and supports mid-to-long term studies to addressinfrequently occurring data. Also, Momento can gather logdata, experience sampling, diary, and other qualitative data.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Ananny, K. Biddick, and C. Strohecker. Constructing public discourse with ethnographic/SMS "texts?". In MobileHCI'03, 368--373, 2003.
2
 
3
A. H. Betiol and W. de Abreu Cybis. Usability testing of mobile devices: A comparison of three approaches. In IFIP INTERACT'05, 470--481, 2005.
4
 
5
S. Carter, J. Mankoff, S. Klemmer, and T. Matthews. Exiting the cleanroom: On ecological validity and ubiquitous computing. HCI Journal. To appear.
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
A. K. Dey, G. D. Abowd, and D. Salber. A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. HCI Journal, 16(2-4):97--166, 2001.
10
 
11
J. Froehlich, M. Y. Chen, I. E. Smith, and F. Potter. Voting with you feet: An investigative study of the relationship between place visit behavior and preference. In Ubicomp'06, 333--350, 2006.
12
13
14
 
15
R. M. Hogarth. Is confidence in decisions related to feedback? In K. Fiedler and P. Juslin, editors, In the beginning there is a sample: Information sampling as a key to understand adaptive cognition. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
16
17
 
18
Infotrends. Mobile Imaging Study. http://www.capv.com/home/Multiclient/mobileimaging2.html, 2006.
 
19
S. S. Intille, E. M. Tapia, J. Rondoni, J. Beaudin, C. Kukla, S. Agarwal, L. Bao, and K. Larson. Tools for studying behavior and technology in natural settings. In Ubicomp'03, 157--174, 2003.
 
20
A. Kaikkonen, A. Kekäläinen, M. Cankar, T. Kallio, and A. Kankainen. Usability testing of mobile applications: A comparison between laboratory and field testing. Journal of Usability Studies, 1(1):4--17, 2005.
 
21
J. Kjeldskov, M. B. Skov, B. S. Als, and R. T. Høegh. Is it worth the hassle? Exploring the added value of evaluating the usability of context-aware mobile systems in the field. In MobileHCI'04, 61--73, 2004.
22
23
 
24
T. Matthews, S. Carter, J. Fong, C. Pai, and J. Mankoff. Scribe4me: Evaluating a mobile sound translation tool for the deaf. In Ubicomp'06, 159--176, 2006.
 
25
26
 
27
 
28
D. Zhang and B. Adipat. Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. IJHCI, 18(3):293--308, 2005.

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Scott Carter: colleagues
Jennifer Mankoff: colleagues
Jeffrey Heer: colleagues