An exploratory study on the roles of network structure and knowledge processing orientation in work unit knowledge management

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

An exploratory study on the roles of network structure and knowledge processing orientation in work unit knowledge management

Full text

Pdf (479 KB)

Source

ACM SIGMIS Database archive
Volume 38 , Issue 2 (May 2007) table of contents

SESSION: Research contibutions table of contents

Pages: 8 - 26

Year of Publication: 2007

ISSN:0095-0033

Authors

Seokwoo Song	University of Texas, Arlington
Sridhar Nerur	University of Texas, Arlington
James T.C. Teng	University of Texas, Arlington

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 24, Downloads (12 Months): 256, Citation Count: 1

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240616.1240620 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Knowledge management (KM), which concerns itself with the creation, storage, access and dissemination of intellectual assets, has been a dominant research theme in recent years. However, given the fact that organizational units differ in the way they process their knowledge, there is a need to understand how informational benefits that a unit within the organization accrues by virtue of its relationships with others in the network impact its creativity and KM effectiveness. In this study, we explore the potential contribution of network characteristics to both the creativity and overall KM effectiveness of intra-organizational units. In attempting to reaffirm and extend previous study findings, we accomplish our initial research objective by relating network characteristics to innovative outcomes with a more complete set of network centrality measures. In addition, the study demonstrates that when there is a fit between network structure and knowledge processing orientation, the effectiveness of perceived KM in the units will improve. Our results suggest that fostering an organizational climate that is conducive to extensive interaction and communication between units is likely to make the units more innovative throughout the organization

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Ahuja, G. (2000). "Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.45, No.3, pp. 425--455.
	2	Manju K. Ahuja , Kathleen M. Carley, Network Structure in Virtual Organizations, Organization Science, v.10 n.6, p.741-757, June 1999 [doi>10.1287/orsc.10.6.741]
	3	Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001). "Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues," MIS Quarterly, Vol.25, No.1, pp. 107--136.
	4	Alexander, J. and Randolph, W. (1985). "The Fit Between Technology and Structure as a Predictor or Performance in Nursing Subunits," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.28, No.4, pp. 844--859.
	5	Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., and Herron, M. (1996). "Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.39, No.5, pp. 1154--1184.
	6	Baum, J.A.C., Calabrese, T., and Silverman, B.S. (2000). "Don¿t Go It Alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startups¿ Performance in Canadian Biotechnology," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, pp. 267--294.
	7	Berg, S., Duncan, J., and Friedman, P. (1982). Joint Venture Strategies and Corporate Innovation, Cambridge: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain.
	8	Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., and Freeman, L.C. (2002). UCINET 6, Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
	9	Brass, D.J. and Burkhardt, M.E. (1993). "Potential Power and Power Use: An Investigation of Structure and Behavior," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.36, No.3, pp. 441--470.
	10	Brass, D.J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H.R., and Tsai, W. (2004). "Taking Stock of Networks Andorganizations: A Multilevel Perspective," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.47, pp. 795--817.
	11	Burkhardt, M.E. and Brass, D.J. (1990). "Changing Patterns or Patterns of Change: The Effects of a Change in Technology on Social Network Structure and Power," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, No.1, pp. 104--127.
	12	Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
	13	Burt, R.S. (1997). "The Contingent Value of Social Capital," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.42, No.2, pp. 339--365.
	14	Burt, R.S. (2000). "The Network Structure of Social Capital," in Sutton, R.I., and Staw, B.M. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 1--83.
	15	Byounggu Choi , Heeseok Lee, An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance, Information and Management, v.40 n.5, p.403-417, May 2003 [doi>10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00060-5]
	16	Coleman, J. (1988). "Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital," American Journal of Sociology, Vol.94, pp. S95--S120.
	17	Cross, R. and Cummings, J.N. (2004). "Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-intensive Work," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.47, No.6, pp. 928--937.
	18	Davenport, T.H., De Long, D.W., and Beers, M.C. (1998). "Successful Knowledge Management Projects," Sloan Management Review, Vol.39, No.2, pp. 43--57.
	19	Thomas H. Davenport , Lawrence Prusak , Laurence Prusak, Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1997
	20	David, F., Pearce, J., and Randoll, W. (1989). "Linking Technology and Structure to Enhance Group Performance," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.74, No.2, pp. 233--241.
	21	DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992). "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, Vol.3, No1, pp. 60--95.
	22	Drucker, P.F. (1994). "The Age of Social Transformation," Atlantic Monthly, Vol.274, No.5, pp. 53--80.
	23	Freeman, L.C. (1979). "Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification," Social Networks, Vol.1, No.215--239.
	24	George, J.M. (1990). "Personality, Affect, and Behavior in Groups," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.75, pp 107--116.
	25	Gibson, C. and Vermeulen, F. (2003). "A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.48, No.2, pp. 202--239.
	26	Gold, A.H., Malhotra, A., and Segars, A.H. (2001). "Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18, No.1, pp. 185--214.
	27	Granovetter, M. (1973). "The Strength of Weak Ties," American Journal of Sociology, Vol.78, pp. 1360--1379.
	28	Grant, R.M. (1996). "Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, pp. 109--122.
	29	Gulati, R. (1999). "Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.20, pp. 397--420.
	30	Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. (2000). "Knowledge Management's Social Dimension: Lessons from NUCOR Steel," Sloan Management Review, Vol.42, No.1, pp. 71--80.
	31	Hackman, J.R. (1992). "Group Influences on Individuals in Organizations," in Dunnette, M.D., and Hough, L.M. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Palo-Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., pp. 199--267.
	32	Hansen, M.T. (1999). "The Search-transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.44, No.1, pp. 82--111.
	33	Morten T. Hansen, Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies, Organization Science, v.13 n.3, p.232-248, May 2002 [doi>10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771]
	34	Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., and Tierney, T. (1999). "What's Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?" Harvard Business Review, Vol.77, No.2, pp. 106--116.
	35	Hargadon, A.B., and Sutton, R.I. (1997). "Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.42, No.4, pp. 716--749.
	36	Hedlund, G. (1994). "A model of knowledge management and the n-form corporation," Strategic Management Journal Vol. 15, pp. 73--90.
	37	Hofmann, D.A. (1997). "An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models," Journal of Management, Vol.23, No.6, pp. 723--744.
	38	Hubert, L., and Schultz, J. (1976). "Quadratic Assignment as a General Data Analysis Strategy," British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, Vol.29, pp. 190--241.
	39	Ibarra, H. (1993). "Network Centrality, Power, and Innovation Involvement: Determinants of Technical and Administrative Roles," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.36, No.3, pp. 471--501.
	40	James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., and Wolf, G. (1984). "Estimating Within Group Interrater Reliability With and Without Response Bias," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.69, No.1, pp. 85--98.
	41	Janz, B.D., Colquitt, J.A., and Noe, R.A. (1997). "Knowledge Worker Team Effectiveness: The Role of Autonomy, Interdependence, Team Development, and Contextual Support Variables," Personnel Psychology, Vol.50, No.4, pp. 877--904.
	42	Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W.H. (1996). "Specific and General Knowledge, and Organizational Structure," in Myers, P.S. (Ed.), Knowledge Management and Organizational Design, Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 17--38.
	43	Keller, R.T. (1994). "Technology-Information Processing Fit and the Performance of R & D Project Groups: A Test of Contingency Theory," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37, No.1, pp. 167--179.
	44	Kenis, P. and Knoke, D. (2002). "How Organizational Field Networks Shape Interorganizational Tie-Formation Rates," Academy of Management Review, Vol.27, No.2, pp. 275--293.
	45	Kilduff, M. and Krackhardt, D. (1994). "Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37, No.1, pp. 87--108.
	46	Knoke, D., and Burt, R.S. (1983). "Prominence," in Burt, R.S., and Minor, M.J. (Eds.), Applied Network Analysis, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 195--222.
	47	Lee, H. and Choi, B. (2003). "Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.20, No.1, pp. 179--229.
	48	M. Lynne Markus , Daniel Robey, Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research, Management Science, v.34 n.5, p.583-599, May 1988 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583]
	49	Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., and Brass, D. (2001). "The Social Networks of High and Low-Self Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.46, pp. 121--146.
	50	Morrison, E.W. (2002). "Newcomers¿ Relationships: The Role of Social Network Ties During Socialization," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.45, No.6, pp. 1149--1160.
	51	Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998). "Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage," Academy of Management Review, Vol.23, pp. 242--266.
	52	Nonaka, I. (1991). "The Knowledge-Creating Company," Harvard Business Review, Vol.69, No.11, pp. 96--104.
	53	Nonaka, I. (1994). "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, Vol.5, No.1, pp. 14--37.
	54	Obstfeld, D. (2005). "Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.50, No.1, pp. 100--130.
	55	Oh, H., Chung, M., and Labianca, G. (2004). "Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.47, pp. 860--875.
	56	Perry-Smith, J.E. (2006). "Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 85--101.
	57	Perry-Smith, J.E. and Shalley, C.E. (2003). "The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective," Academy of Management Review, Vol.28, No.1, pp. 89--106.
	58	Prencipe, A. and Tell, F. (2001). "Inter-Project Learning: Processes and Outcomes of Knowledge Codification in Project-Based Firms," Research Policy, Vol.30, No.9, pp. 597--621.
	59	Reagans, R. and McEvily, B. (2003). "Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.48, pp. 240--267.
	60	Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., and McEvily, B. (2004). "How to Make the Team: Social Networks vs. Demography as Criteria
	61	Ray Reagans , Ezra W. Zuckerman, Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams, Organization Science, v.12 n.4, p.502-517, July 2001 [doi>10.1287/orsc.12.4.502.10637]
	62	Sabherwal, R. and Becerra-Fernandez, I. (2003). "An Empirical Study of the Effect of Knowledge Management Processes at Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels," Decision Sciences, Vol.34, No.2, pp. 225--260.
	63	Salmenkaita, J.P. (2004). "Intangible Capital in Industrial Research: Effects of Network Position on Individual Inventive Productivity," in Bettis, R. (Ed.), Strategy in Transition, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 220--248.
	64	Schulz, M. and Jobe, L.A. (2001). "Codification and Tacitness as Knowledge Management Strategies: An Empirical Exploration," Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol.12, pp. 139--165.
	65	Shrout, P.E. and Fleiss, J.L. (1979). "Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability," Psychological Bulletin, Vol.86, pp. 420--428.
	66	Sparrowe, R.T., Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., and Kraimer, M.L. (2001). "Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44, No.2, pp. 316--325.
	67	Stuart, T.E. (1998). "Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.43, pp. 668--698.
	68	Suarez, F.F. (2005). "Network Effects Revisited: The Role of Strong Ties in Technology Selection," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.48, No.4, pp. 710--720.
	69	Szulanski, G. (1996). "Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, pp. 27--44.
	70	Teigland, R. and Wasko, M.M. (2003). "Integrating Knowledge Through Information Trading: Examining the Relationship Between Boundary Spanning Communication and Individual Performance," Decision Sciences, Vol.34, No.2, pp. 261--286.
	71	Tsai, W. (2000). "Social Capital, Strategic Relatedness and the Formation of Intra-Organizational Linkages," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, pp. 925--939.
	72	Tsai, W. (2001). "Knowledge Transfer in Intra-Organizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44, No.5, pp. 996--1004.
	73	Tsai, W. and Ghoshal, S. (1998). "Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks," Academy of Management Journal, Vol.41, No.4, pp. 464--476.
	74	Uzzi, B. (1997). "Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.42, pp 35--67.
	75	Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
	76	Zack, M.H. (1999). "Developing a Knowledge Strategy," California Management Review, Vol.41, No.3, pp. 125--145.
	77	Zander, U.B. and Kogut, B. (1995). "Knowledge and the Speed of Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test," Organization Science, Vol.6, No.1, pp. 76--92.