ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Sharing the cost more efficiently: Improved approximation for multicommodity rent-or-buy
Full text PdfPdf (245 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) archive
Volume 3 ,  Issue 2  (May 2007) table of contents
Article No. 23  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:1549-6325
Authors
L. Becchetti  Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Roma, Italy
J. Könemann  University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
S. Leonardi  Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Roma, Italy
M. Páal  Google Inc., New York, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 46,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240233.1240246
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the multicommodity rent-or-buy (MROB) network design problems, we are given a network together with a set of k terminal pairs (s1, t1), …, (sk, tk. The goal is to provision the network so that a given amount of flow can be shipped between si and ti for all 1 ≤ ik simultaneously. In order to provision the network, one can either rent capacity on edges at some cost per unit of flow, or buy them at some larger fixed cost. Bought edges have no incremental, flow-dependent cost. The overall objective is to minimize the total provisioning cost.

Recently, Gupta et al. [2003a] presented a 12-approximation for the MROB problem. Their algroithm chooses a subset of the terminal pairs in the graph at random and then buys the edges of an approximate Steiner forest for these pairs. This technique had previously been introduced [Gupta et al. 2003b] for the single-sink rent-or-buy network design problem.

In this article we give a 6.828-approximation for the MROB problem by refining the algorithm of Gupta et al. and simplifying their analysis. The improvement in our article is based on a more careful adaptation and simplified analysis of the primal-dual algorithm for the Steiner forest problem due to Agrawal et al. [1995]. Our result significantly reduces the gap between the single-sink and multisink case.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
9
10
11
 
12
 
13

Collaborative Colleagues:
L. Becchetti: colleagues
J. Könemann: colleagues
S. Leonardi: colleagues
M. Páal: colleagues