ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The impact of quasi-equally spaced sensor layouts on field reconstruction
Full text PdfPdf (250 KB)
Source
Information Processing In Sensor Networks archive
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks table of contents
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
POSTER SESSION: IPSN/SPOTS posters table of contents
Pages: 274 - 282  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-638-X
Authors
Alessandro Nordio  Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Carla Chiasserini  Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Emanuele Viterbo  University of Calabria, Cosenza, Italy
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGBED: ACM Special Interest Group on Embedded Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1236360.1236397
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider wireless sensor networks whose nodes are randomly deployed and, thus, provide an irregular sampling of the sensed field. The field is assumed to be bandlimited; a sink node collects the data gathered by the sensors and reconstructs the field by using a technique based on linear filtering. By taking the mean square error (MSE) as performance metric, we evaluate the effect of quasi-equally spaced sensor layouts on the quality of the reconstructed signal. The MSE is derived through asymptotic analysis for different sensor spatial distributions, and for two of them we are able to obtain an approximate closed form expression. The case of uniformly distributed sensors is also considered for the sake of comparison. The validity of our asymptotic analysis is shown by comparison against numerical results and it is proven to hold even for a small number of nodes. Finally, with the help of a simple example, we show the key role that our results play in the deployment of sensor networks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
T. Strohmer, "Efficient Methods for Digital Signal and Image Reconstruction from Nonuniform Samples.", PhD thesis, University of Vienna, 1993.
 
3
T. Strohmer, T. Binder and M. Süssner, "How to recover smooth object boundaries in noisy medical images", IEEE ICIP'96, pp.331--334, Lausanne, 1996.
 
4
M. Rauth and T. Strohmer, "A frequency domain approach to the recovery of geophysical potentials," Proc. Conf. SampTA'97, pp.109--114, Aveiro/Portugal, 1997.
 
5
R. Daley, "Atmospheric Data Analysis," Cambridge Atmospheric and Space Science Series, 1991.
 
6
7
 
8
P. Zhao, c. Zhao, ans P.G. Casazza, "Perturbation of Regular Sampling in Shift-Invariant Spaces for Frames" IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 52, no. 10, pp.4643--4648, October 2006.
 
9
D.S. Early and D.G. Long, "Image reconstruction and enhanced resolution imaging from irregular samples," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 39, no. 2, pp.291--302, February 2001.
 
10
A. Nordio, C-F. Chiasserini, and E. Viterbo, "Bandlimited Field Reconstruction for Wireless Sensor Networks" Tech. Rep., Politecnico di Torino, January 2006.
 
11
A. Nordio, C-F. Chiasserini, and E. Viterbo, "Performance of Field Reconstruction Techniques with Noise and Uncertain Sensor Locations" IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, submitted, October 2006.
 
12
13
14
 
15
G. Strang, "Wavelet Transforms Versus Fourier Transforms," Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 28, no. 2, pp. 288--305, 1993.
 
16
 
17
 
18
E. W. Weisstein, "Euler-Mascheroni Constant," from MathWorld -- A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Euler-MascheroniConstant.html

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alessandro Nordio: colleagues
Carla Chiasserini: colleagues
Emanuele Viterbo: colleagues