ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Robust system multiangulation using subspace methods
Full text PdfPdf (206 KB)
Source
Information Processing In Sensor Networks archive
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks table of contents
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
SESSION: Applications and localization table of contents
Pages: 61 - 68  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-638-X
Authors
Joshua N. Ash  Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Lee C. Potter  Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGBED: ACM Special Interest Group on Embedded Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 83,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1236360.1236369
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Sensor location information is a prerequisite to the utility of most sensor networks. In this paper we present a robust and low-complexity algorithm to self-localize and orient sensors in a network based on angle-of-arrival (AOA) information. The proposed non-iterative subspace-based method is robust to missing and noisy measurements and works for cases when sensor orientations are either known or unknown. We show that the computational complexity of the algorithm is O (mn2), where m is the number of measurements and n is the total number of sensors. Simulation results demonstrate that the error of the proposed subspace algorithm is only marginally greater than an iterative maximum-likelihood estimator (MLE), while the computational complexity is two orders of magnitude less. Additionally, the iterative MLE is prone to converge to local maxima in the likelihood function without accurate initialization. We illustrate that the proposed subspace method can be used to initialize the MLE and obtain near-Cramér-Rao performance for sensor localization. Finally, the scalability of the subspace algorithm is illustrated by demonstrating how clusters within a large network may be individually localized and then merged.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Ash and L. Potter. Sensor network localization via received signal strength measurements with directional antennas. Proc. 42nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing pages 1861--1870, Monticello, IL, Sep 2004.
 
2
 
3
I. Borg and P. Groenen. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications Springer, 1997.
4
 
5
J.C. Chen, K. Yao, and R.E. Hudson. Source localization and beamforming. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 19(2):30--39, 2002.
 
6
T.F. Coleman and Y. Li. An interior, trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM Journal on Optimization 6:418--445, 1996.
 
7
L. Doherty, L. El Ghaoui, and K. Pister. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. Proc. INFOCOM 3:1655--1663, 2001.
 
8
G. Golub and C. Van Loan. Matrix Computations Johns Hopkins University Press, 3rd edition, 1996.
 
9
M. Gu and S.C. Eisenstat. A stable and fast algorithm for updating the singular value decomposition. Technical Report YALEU/DCS/RR-966, New Haven, CT, 1993.
 
10
R.L. Moses, D. Krishnamurthy, and R. Patterson. An auto-calibration method for unattended ground sensors. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 3(4):III-2941-III-2944, May 13-17, 2002.
 
11
D. Niculescu and B. Nath. Ad hoc positioning system (APS)using AOA.Proc. INFOCOM 3:1734--1743, 2003.
 
12
N. Patwari, J.N. Ash, S. Kyperountas, A.O. Hero III, R.L. Moses, and N.S. Correal. Locating the nodes: cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 22(4):54--69, July 2005.
 
13
14
 
15
P.H. Schönemann and R.M. Carroll. Fitting one matrix to another under choice of a central dilation and a rigid motion. Psychometrika 35:245--255, 1970.
 
16
J. Smith and J. Abel. Closed-form least-squares source location estimation from range-difference measurements. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing ASSP-35(12), 1987.
 
17
N. Srebro and T. Jaakkola. Weighted low-rank approximations. Proc. of the 20th International Conf. on Machine Learning 2003.
 
18
G. Stewart. An updating algorithm for subspace tracking. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing 40(6):1535--1541, June 1992.
 
19
P. Stoica and R. Moses. Spectral Analysis of Signals Prentice Hall, 2005.
 
20
J.B. Tenenbaum, V. de Silva, and J.C. Langford. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290(5500):2319--2323, 2000.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Joshua N. Ash: colleagues
Lee C. Potter: colleagues